Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was interviewed by Mike Wallace (born Myron Leon Wallace) and aired two years ago on “60 Minutes”. It’s edited version was re-aired on C-Span last month. The edited version proves once again how Israeli propaganda mafia is working day and night to paint Iranian president to be a modern Hitler, who wants to wipe-out the Jewish people (though more than two-third world Jewish population live outside Israel).
It’s a deliberate move by Israeli propaganda machine (HASBRA) and its affiliated Jewish Lobby groups and Zionist-controlled western mass media – to hoodwink the public from the real issues related to foreign Jewish occupation of Palestine and the rest of Middle East.
Following is the edited version of Ahmadinejad interview with what was deleted in the bold:
Wallace – “You’re very good at filibustering. You still have not answered the question: “Israel must be wipe off the Map. Why?”
Ahmadinejad – “Well, don’t be hasty, sir. I am going to get to that.”
Wallace – “I am not hasty.”
Ahmadinejad – “I think the Israel government is a fabricated government and I have talked about the solution. The solution is democracy. We have said allow Palestinian people to participate in a free and fair referendum to express their views. What we are saying only serves the cause of durable peace. We want durable peace in that part of the world. A durable peace will only come about with once the views of the people are met.
So we said that allow the people of Palestine to participate in a referendum to choose their desired government, and of course, and for the war to come an end as well. Why they’re refusing this to go ahead? Even the Palestinian administration and government, which has been elected by the people is being attacked on daily basis and its high-ranking officials are assassinated and arrested. Yesterday, the Speaker of Palestinian parliament was arrested, elected by the people, mind you. So how long this can go on?
We believe this problem has to be dealt with fundamentally. I believe that the American government is blindly supporting the occupation. It should lift its support, allow the people to participate in free and fair elections. Whatever happens, let it be. We will accept and go along. The result will be as you said earlir, sir.
Wallace – “Look, I mean no respet. Let’s make a deal. I will listen to your complete answers, if you will stay for all my questions. My concern is that we might run out of time.”
Ahmadinejad – “Well, you’re free to ask me any question you please, and I am hoping that I am free to be able to say whatever is on my mind. You’re free to put any question you want to me, and of course, please give me the right to respond fully to your questions to say what is on my mind.
Do you perhaps want me to say what you want me to say? Am I to understand…
Wallace – “No.”
2 responses so far ↓
rehmat1 // October 1, 2008 at 4:33 pm |
I will let Paul Craig Roberts answer the Zionist propaganda idiot, Kenneth aka Ken’s, latest whining about Dr. Ahmadinejad…
“Although our Founding Fathers would have comprehended and endorsed Ahmadinejad`s speech to the United Nations, present-day Americans would find it strange should they happen to hear about it.
Unlike their forbears, Americans today live a material life, not a spiritual one. Americans are far too likely to dismiss Ahmadinejad`s words about obeisance to God and justice as the mumbo-jumbo of an “Islamist extremist.”
The hubris of Americans and their belief in U.S. “exceptionalism” would cause them to reject Ahmadinejad`s holding the US, its NATO puppets, and Israel accountable before the UN General Assembly. So successfully has Ahmadinejad been demonized by the propagandistic US media that his speech would be dismissed out of hand by the arrogance of those who regard themselves as the salt of the earth.
Ahmadinejad echos the statements of other world leaders when he says that US power is rapidly waning. The US “superpower” is dependent on foreigners for its financing. The US cannot exist without Chinese financing, just as Europe cannot exist without Russian energy. America`s European puppet regimes are rethinking the consequences of serving US hegemony.
A “superpower” that cannot subdue Iraq and Afghanistan cannot subdue Russia and China. Do Americans and their neocon leaders believe that China and Russia will lend the US the money to finance a war against themselves? Do they believe that Russia will keep America`s NATO puppets supplied with energy if American aggression against Russia intensifies?
Warnings about America`s financial dependency on foreigners have been ignored.
The bailout of the US financial system is entirely dependent on the willingness of the Chinese, Saudis, and other foreigners to use their trade surpluses with the US to purchase the US Treasury instruments that must be sold in order to raise the money for Bush`s bailout of the financial institutions.
The bailout of the US government`s budget has been going on for years, and it takes place every time the US Treasury holds an auction of new American debt. But now the bailout by foreigners of the US government is starting to turn into much larger sums that carry much higher risks.
Last week the Financial Times reported that Peer Steinbruck, the Finance Minister of Germany, said that the American financial crisis was “a fundamental rupture” and that “the US will lose its status as the superpower of the world financial system.”
Steinbruck is being charitable. The US lost that status when it became dependent on foreigners to finance American consumption of foreign goods and US goods and services produced offshore in addition to the war-swollen budget deficits of the US government. Indeed, foreigners finance Americans` home mortgages. The Chinese alone hold about $400 billion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds.
Is Ahmadinejad correct in his view that, with the waning of American hegemonic power, the world is on the verge of a better, more humane, and more just world? I wonder. Many Americans think of themselves as hard-nosed realists. They believe that it is a dog-eat-dog world: We have to get “them” before they get us. This paranoid view is the basis of US foreign and military policy. It holds that America must not only have the military power to overwhelm any combination of possible enemies, but also America must prevent the rise of any country or countries that could challenge American power. This is a “diplomacy” without any concept of peaceful coexistence or good will among men. Yet, Americans think of themselves as a Christian nation.
Neocons and macho Republicans think we don`t win our wars because we lack the balls to use enough force. They believe that the US should nuke every country that doesn`t follow our orders. Indeed, many American “conservatives” are lusting for the US to nuke a country in order “to teach the world a lesson.”
To accommodate this blood-lust, the Bush Pentagon revised US war doctrine to permit preemptive nuclear attack even upon non-nuclear-armed countries. During the long cold war, preemptive nuclear attack was not a US option.
Which vision of the future will win out? Ahmadinejad`s policy of peaceful co-existence or neoconservative desires for American world dominance? The chance is too high for comfort that the hubris and arrogance of the United States will lead to a nuclear confrontation that will destroy the world.
People of good will hope that Ahmadinejad and Steinbruck`s views will prevail and that the rest of the world will wake up and ask if they want to continue financing America`s hegemonic ventures that threaten life on earth. The day the foreign bankers turn off the credit spigot to the US Treasury, American arrogance will be tamed. “
rehmat1 // October 1, 2008 at 5:26 pm |
I prefer to response Zionist creep, Kenneth’s (Time Immorial) “child bride” allegation separately.
I wonder his mother told him that she, being Jewish, could have been raped by some Jew, when she turned three-year-plus-one day – according to Jewish Bible (Numbers 31:17-18 and Numbers 31:35-40) !!
“….According to the Tannaïte Rabbis, MOSES therefore had ordered the Israelites to kill all women older than three years and a day, because they were “suitable for having sexual relations…..”
“Said Rabbi Joseph, “Come and take note: A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse…..”
“A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. “A girl three years old may be betrothed through an act of sexual intercourse,” the words of R. Meir. And sages say, “Three years and one day old.”…
According history – St. Mary gave birth to Jesus when she was 13-year-old.
According to Shia scholars – Ai’sha was 16-year-old when she entered the Prophet’s household.
I wonder why the Talmudic Zionist creep avoids to look into his own backyards before blaming others!!
You must be logged in to post a comment.