Jewish Lobby furious over Qaddafi’s visit to UN

“Under Obama’s engagement with friend and foe alike – diplomatic advances were expected to flow like wine. Instead, friends disregarded US pleas and released Megrahi, and foes received the convicted terrorist with fanfare,” – John Bolton, the former USrael ambassador at the UN – London’s Daily Telegraph. I bet the Crypto-Jew would not like to mention how many times the ‘the best friend (Israel)’ has told America to ‘go to hell’ when Washington asked Tel Aviv to do something which is in the interests of the US but not in Israel’s intersts?

The Jew Lobby is furious over the news that Libya’s dictator, Muamar Qaddafi is planning to make his first-ever visit to United Nations General Assembly next month. Most probably, he decided to attend the world forum because the President of 192-member world forum 46th session in September is a Libyan diplomat, Dr. Ali Abdussalam Tareki 71. The Jewish Lobby has already put into motion the venomous propaganda it has reserved for Iran’s President, Dr. Ahmadinejad, since his call for the removal of Zionism from world’s political culture.

America’s  Zionist-controlled mainstream media is flashing the news of the ‘furious’ families of the victims of the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie and Jewish Lobby is arranging mass protests like the ‘Save Darfur’ protests in the past – to greet the Libyan leader in New York and New Jersey (former NJ Governor, James McGreevey had to resign in 2004 as result of his sexual experiment with a Jewish gay staff member, Golan Cipel, an Israeli Mossad mole).

Libyan officials were considering setting up a Bedouin-style tent at a Libyan-owned estate in the upscale suburb of Englewood to accommodate Qaddafi and his entourage to attend the upcoming 64th Session of the UN General Assembly on September 23. Relatives of the 38 victims from NJ had threatened to converge on New York to mount a protest when Gaddafi attends the United Nations General Assembly. However, the Zionist propagandists and the shameless families of the ‘vitims’ don’t want the public to know – is the generosity of Qaddafi for paying US$10 million to each of the family of the 270 victims (US$2.7 billion claim settlement). It is too generous as compared to the US paying US$61.8 million for killing 290 passengers on Iran Air Flight 655 – which was shot-down over Iranian territorial waters at Strait of Hormuz by USS Vincennes on July 3, 1988. Both the US and Israel refuses to pay any compensation to their civlian victims in Iraq, Palestine or Afghanistan (warning for horrible pictures on the link).

Habib Siddique in his column, Libya and Western hypocrisy, wrote:

“I have never been an admirer of the Libyan strongman. But I am not sorry to point out that all this fuss around Megrahi’s release from the Scottish prison and opposition to Gaddafi’s anticipated appearance in the UN is nothing but blatant hypocrisy and double standard. Much that we may hate to admit, by paying handsomely the victims of terrorism, both at home and abroad, Gaddafi has set a higher standard than the USA on a comparable basis. For years, when the USA and Israel were Apartheid South Africa’s best friends, Gaddafi was a trusted comrade of Nelson Mandela’s ANC. He has more rights than any of the Israeli leaders that have had attended the UN General Assembly. If Governor Corzine (NJ) and Mayor Bloomberg (NYC) had no problem in letting such mass murderers to enter New Jersey and New York City, they should not set a double-standard now for Libya’s Gaddafi….”

Zionists’ academic terrorism

“Why discredit, defame and silence those with opposing viewpoints? I believe it is because the Zionist Lobby knows it cannot win based on facts,” – Dr. Joel Beinin (Jewish professor at Stanford University in his article “Silencing critics not way to Middle East peace”, San Francisco Chronicle, February 4, 2007).

“I grew up as a White girl in the Jim Crow South and I have spent my adult life in the study of racism, what I see when I go to Palestine is Jim Crow on steroids,” – Tema Okun, a Jewish academic in ‘A Jewish state – or Jewish values?’, Mondoweiss, July 12, 2009).

“How tragic that in our own time the very state established by the Jews in the aftermath of this evil has become a place where racialism, religious discrimination, militarism, and injustic prevail; and that Israel itself has become a pariah state whin the world community. Events taking place today are all too reminiscent of the pogroms from which our own forefathers fled two and three generations ago – but this time those in authority are Jews and the victims are Muslim and Christian Palestinians,” – statement from 18 prominent American Jews, The Nation, February 3, 1988.

Many Universities in the US have a long history of sanctioning academic, students, and holding debates – critical to the Zionist entity, Zionism or even Zionist Jews – from professor Norman Finkelstein to professor William I. Robinson (University of California – ADL charging his e-mail criticizing Israeli attacks on Gaza, Dec-Jan 2009 – as ‘anti-Semitism’) to professor Joel Kovel being fired from Bard College (for authoring the book ‘Overcoming Zionism’) to professor Tariq Ramadan (banned from joining Notre Dame University in 2004 and now fired by Dutch University for hosting a religious show at Iranian TV).

Since September 11, 2001 – this Zionazi censorship of ‘freedom of speech’ has beening creeping into neighboring Canada too. The pro-Israeli Jewish groups like Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), Canada Israel Committee, Jewish Defence League, B’nai Brith, etc. has been going crazy to get Ottawa ban anti-Zionist academics, politician, books and even words (calling Israel an Apartheid state) from telling the truth about Zionist imperialism in the Middle East and their Nazi-style treatment of the native Muslim and Christian Palestinians. Be it professor Norman Finkelstein (a Jew) or David Olesker (a British-born Israeli Jew) or George Galloway (former Mayor of London and a Christian British MP) or Dr. David F. Nobel (a Jew professor at York University, who filed a ‘character assassination’ law suit against Canadian Jewish lobby groups for US$25 million in 2006) or the Jewish professor Michael Neumann (Peterbrough’s Trent University for his “anti-Israel” essays) or professor Yakov M. Rabkin (University of Montreal, who was called ‘a self-hating Jew’ for authoring the book ‘A Threat from Within: A Century of Jewish Opposition to Zionism’). But in contrast to that anti-Muslim racist Jews like Daniel Pipes, Israeli prime minister Bibi, and dozens of Israeli academics have been welcomed at Toronto’s York University, Concordia University, and other Universities across Canada.

Canadian lawyer and writer, Edward C. Corrigan, in his latest article titled Is it anti-Semitic to defend Palestinian human rights?, published in The Canadian Charger (August 26, 2009), wrote:

“All across Canada and in the United States, there is an organized campaign to suppress criticism of Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. The campaign is especially strong on university campuses where many voices have been raised in support of human rights for the Palestinians. One such example is the attempt to suppress the Public Interest Research Group, founded by Ralph Nader, at the University of Ottawa for their support for Palestinian human rights.

Similar anti-Palestinian campaigns have occurred at many universities in Canada including the University of Toronto, the University of Western Ontario and York University.

An attack against a student group that was sympathetic to the Palestinians occurred at the University of Western Ontario in 1982. The student group was refused official recognition because of its support for the Palestinians and for sponsoring Palestinian and Arab speakers. After this refusal a complaint was made to the Ontario Human Rights Commission.

After a long battle, and with the support of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and its General Counsel Alan Borovoy, and a supportive editorial in The Globe & Mail, the Ontario Human Rights Commission compelled the University Students Council at the University of Western Ontario to issue a statement of regret and to ratify the student group. The refusal was deemed discriminatory against Palestinians and persons associated with Palestinians.

Another tactic is to smear such individuals who have supported the Palestinians with allegations of anti-Semitism. One such individual was Arch Bishop Desmond Tutu. A few complaints from the Jewish community led to the Noble Prize winner being banned from speaking on campus by the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. Tutu was attacked because of statements he made criticizing Israeli policy toward the Palestinians that some Jewish individuals said were “anti Semitic.”

This campaign is also an attack on the numerous dissenting Jews who support human rights for the Palestinians. Canadian Jewish groups like Not in Our Name (NION) and Jewish Independent Voices (Canada) and their support for the Palestinians and their criticism of the “Jewish State,” are simply ignored. For political purposes they simply do not exist.

The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, as well as the massacres, rapes and illegal confiscation of Palestinian property, is well documented by Israeli historians.

The view that it is anti-Semitic to criticize Israel, or its actions, is pure and simple racism against Palestinians. The Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims have many legitimate reasons to criticize the policies and actions of “the Jewish State.” A state that aggressively, and repeatedly, attacks its neighbours and is slowly but systematically ethnically cleansing its non-Jewish population is not above criticism.

Many Jews are anti-Zionist and opposed the settlement of Jews in Palestine….”

Manufacturing the ‘Muslim terrorism’

A growing number of independent non-Muslim researchers, authors and activists in the West and India have come to the conclusion that the great majority of mainstream media’s portraying of Muslims as being ‘terrorists’ – has been ‘manufactured’ to serve the interests of anti-Muslim individuals, groups and governments. The affect is that the brain-washed public’s image of Muslims either being a terrorists or their sympathizers – has become part of culture in many parts of the world.

Susan Faludi, the feminist-author and Pulitzer- Prize winning journalist – in her book ‘The Terror Dream: Fear and Fantasy in Post 9/11 America’ – explains how the Zionist-dominated mainstream media turned their propaganda lies into “facts”. She calls media reaction to 9/11 attacks as: “Cocooning ourselves in the celluloid chrysalis of the baby boom’s childhood..” In the book, Susan also mentions the American culture of projecting criminals as ‘masculine’ and ‘national heroes’. She cites articles such as: “The Stud: Donald Rumsfeld: America’s New Pin-up” (The National Review) and Jewish-owned Time and Newsweek, calling Dubya Bush as “The Lone Ranger” and “Dragon Slayer” respectively.

There have been many terrorist incidents involving Israeli Jews which are usually not reported by the Jewish-controlled American mainstream media. Furthermore, the criminals caught are rarely convicted. For example, two israelis were arrested near a nuclear plant in Georgia; two Israelis were arrested for transporting suspicious material in Tennessee; two Israelis with altered passport were arrested for driving a truck having traces of TNT in Washington state; two Israelis were detained for carrying a detailed footage of Sear Tower in Chicago; Cloudcroft chief of police stopped Israelis with suspicious cargo in New Mexico; 800 Israeli “art students” deported to Israel after 9/11; an Israeli passport holder with nuke plans escaped from police custody in Midwest, and the list goes on…

The US State Department in its annual report on terrorism since 1998 – has shown that most of terrorist acts against American interests are carried out in South America while the least are carried out in the Middle East. Such reports have always upset the pro-Israel ‘Islamophobes’, who whine that these figures don’t include the “terrorist activities” carried out against the “peaceful” Jews in occupied Palestine by Islamic resistance groups like Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hizb’Allah.

It’s interesting to note that when Zionist FM, Tzipi Livni’s called Hamas “a terrorist group” in January 2009 – Sir Gerald Kaufman, the British Jewish MP remarked: “Her (Tzipi’s) father was a chief operations officer of the Jewish terrorist group Irgun Zvai Leumi…..Israel was born out of terrorism. Jewish terrorists hanged two British sergeants and massacred 254 Palestinians in Deir Yassin village in 1948.”

There is no doubt that wars on both Afghanistan and Iraq were sold to the American public by the anti-Muslim Jew lobbying groups in the US and Europe for the benefit of Israel. Israel has long found an anti-Muslim Hindu willing partner in India who have been running a similar ‘terrorist’ media campaign against India’s largest Muslim minority (130 million).

A recent report titled Media on Terror - prepared by a group of Indian secular non-Muslim activist from Karnataka – came to the conclusion that both Hindi and English press in India has fabricated the notion of ‘Islamic terrorism’ so much so that the image of Muslims in general being either terrorist or their sympathizers. The report is based on an analysis of reporting of ‘terrorism’ in the Bangalore editions of leading Kannada and English newspapers over several months in 2008.

According to the report – “the language and rhetorics used in the reporting reflected an obvious and deep-rooted bias against Muslims, and a deliberate effort to create a sense of seige among Hindus…… By presenting no version other than that of the police – the ‘investigative’ aspect of journalism in Karnataka on the matter of alleged Muslims involvement in ‘terrorism’ has in fact been reduced to ‘stenographic reporting’.”

Another finding reported that in some cases Muslim arrested for in possesion of the so-called “Jihadi materials” – were in fact CDs or copies of Holy Qur’an – which are available to anyone in major bookstores. Some reporters mentioned the pressure exerted on them by the state bureau chiefs to file reports which were ‘exclusive’ to the organization. This conduced, the reprt says, to sensationalism and even to the fabrication of reports.

One of the reporter for Kannada Prabha in Hubli interviewed by the team – openly admitted that 60% of the reports he had filed were false and inaccurate. Similarly, Hubli reporter for the Times of India admitted to using a photograph of an unrelated dargah with his report about an alleged Muslim terrorist camp, and falsly described the flag near the dargah as a Pakistani one. In fact, it so turned out, the correspondent himself had never been to the location…..”