Monthly Archives: September 2009

Haven’t we been there before!

Let’s talk – Let’s negotiate

We can have a conference, a summit, a debate

A multifaith dialogue to eliminate hate

We’ll shake hands and smile

And make the six o’ clock news

For supporting the peace process

Between Arab and Jews

And we will only talk

But not about ethnic cleansing

Forget Dier Yassin

Don’t speak about apartheid – Or the destruction of Jenin

Be blind to the pains in Gazzah

The hunger, the disease, the rubbles, the fire

DON’T MENTION THE RIGHTS OF REFUGEES – When we talk…. by Samah Sabawi

On September 22, 2009 – World witnessed USrael’s latest charade. I mean the President Barack Hussein Obama’s “three-way meeting” with Zionist entity’s radical Jewish prime minister Benjamin Netanyanhu and the Fatah’s president Mahmoud Abbas, whose mandate as ‘President of PA’ had expired in January 2009. The absence of Palestinians’ democratically elected government of Hamas – said volumes of how much Obama would be different from the previous occupants of the White House in curing the Zionist cancer in the Middle East.

The ‘handshake’ photo without Bibi’s commitment to Jewish settlement freeze – provided victory to the fanatic Israeli leaders to celebrate after listening to Obama’s speech next day at the United Nations General Assembly, which most probably was written by Bibi’s speech-writer. While Obama blamed Islamic Iran for most of the world’s problems – it paid only lip service to Palestinians under Jewish occupation. Could it be me alone who smells skunk in his statement: “The time has come to relaunch negotiations without pre-conditions that address the permanent status issues: security for Israelis and Palestinians; borders, refugees and Jerusalem. the goal is clear: two states living side by side in peace and security; a Jewish State of Israel, with true security for all Israelis; and a viable, independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation that began in 1967, and realizes the potential of Palestinian people….”

Now the above statement raises many questions and seems contradictory to Obama’s earlier pro-Israeli policy statements. For example, how could Israel, now, become a “Jewish State of Israel” when it’s not even recognized as such by the UNSC? The word “Jewish” was crossed out by US President Harry Truman on May 14, 1948. At Annapolis Conference, Bush, too, declared that Israel has to be a “Jewish State” - which was immediately rejected by PLO negotiator, Saeb Erekat – because the 1.5 million non-Jewish Arabs living within Israel not only contradicted the term – but by calling the occupation as a “Jewish State” – Bush signalled that he favored the Israeli position in future negotiations on the right of return for Palestinian refugees.

Though, Obama became the first US president to acknowledge the root cause of Muslims’ hatred towards the US and the violence in the Middle East – but he still insists that the victims of European colonization should offer more to Israel. But the Palestinians have nothing to offer. Seventyeight percent of their land is already occupied by the Zionist regime. Obama’s envoy, George Mitchel, though has the Israel Lobby’s blessings and has met both Bibi and Abbas several times but without any flexibility in the Israeli stand.

President Obama wants Palestinians to abandon military resistance and use non-violent means to settle their disputes with Israel. Does he believe that the Western Jews occupied Palestine through non-violent protests?

President Obama wants an “independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation that began in 1967, and realizes the potential of Palestinian people.” However, Bibi\’s vision of the proposed Palestinian State is “a demilitarized State with Israel controlling its borders and airspace”. One dare to ask: Would Obama accept Russia controlling the borders and airspace of his country?

Both Netyanahu and his Zionazi sidekick, Avigdor Lieberman, are least interested in words like dialogues, peace process, Jewish settlements, land for peace, etc. YES, they do want to talk – but not about the land Jews stole from native Muslims and Christians or their Zionazi behaviour towards their victims – but the non-existent “Iranian nuclear threat” to the region. According to the Zionist regime and its western puppet – the only way to establish peace and security in the Middle East is to bomb Islamic Iran back to 10th century, as they did to Iraq and Afghanistan on earlier Israeli bidding.

Gilad Atzmon in his comments on Bibi’s speech at the UN wrote:

“Israeli love their Shoa (Holocaust), for the Shoa is no doubt is their best selling Hasbara (propaganda) product. It somehow allows them to kill en masse and to do it indistinguishably while insisting that it is they who happen to be the victims.”

Answering Netanyahu’s assertion that “the greatest threat facing the world today is the marriage between religious fanaticism and the weapon of mass destruction (meaning Islamic Iran),” – Gilad Atzmon responded: “In fact, no one can describe the danger posed by the Jewish state and Zionism any better. Israel is indeed a deadly marriage between Old Testament gross genocidal barbarism, Zionist fanaticism and a huge arsenal of WMDs,chemical, biological and nuclear that has already been partially put into action….”

Erdogan does it again!

It seems the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is getting into the habit of making “political incorrect” statements. We all remember Erdodan’s “anti-Semitic” stunt at the Davos conference by crossing Zionist terrorist Shimon Peres on Zionist entity’s genocide of 1.5 million Gazzah civilians. This time Erdogan defended Iran’s right to develop its nuclear industry for civilian purpose as every other country is entitled as signatory to NPT.

IOn Saturday, in a conference in New York after attending the G20 meeting in Pittsburg, Erdogon told reporters: ““We are completely against nuclear weapons in the Middle East. There is a country in the Middle East that possesses nuclear weapon: Israel. There is a difference, though; Israel is not a member of the IAEA, while Iran is. Moreover, phosphorus bombs were used in Gaza. What is this? A weapon of mass destruction.”

Erdoğan also said on Saturday that Turkey would push the Security Council to discuss a report by UN investigators accusing Israel and Palestinian militants of war crimes in the Gaza war.  “We will definitely take the position to discuss this issue on the Security Council,” Erdoğan told reporters.

A UN fact-finding mission led by South African jurist Richard Goldstone issued a report last week that said both the Israeli army and Palestinian militants had committed war crimes, and possibly crimes against humanity, during the December-January war in the Gaza Strip. The report urged the Security Council to refer the allegations to the International Criminal Court in The Hague if either Israel or Palestinian authorities failed to investigate and prosecute those suspected of the crimes within six months.

Erdoğan said there should be “accountability” for anyone guilty of war crimes in Gaza.   “We’re in favor of opening discussions on the Goldstone report, and whoever is the guilty party, they should be identified and face the necessary sanctions,” he said.

Currently, Turkey is one of 10 UN Security Council’s non-veto members.

Erdogan is expected to pay an official visit to Islamic Iran next month – during which he will have a meeting with Dr. Ahmadinejad to discuss problems facing the Muslim world and Turkish-Iranian cooperation in the oil and gas sectors. Islamic Iran has become Turkey’s second largest trade partner after the US.

Ahmadinejad at Pittsburgh G20 Summit

Iranian President Dr. Ahmadinejad, though, was not present in person at the Pittsburgh (September 24-25) gathering of the world’s twenty “Greedy Nations (G20)” which control more than 80% of world’s total wealth – but he did take great attention from the western ZOG leaders attending that meeting. The ZOG leaders from the US, France, Britain and Canada while joined the other G20 leaders in their plans how to continue exploiting the natural resources of the less fortunate nations – spend great time in covering their frustration as result of Dr. Ahmadinejad’s speech at the United Nations General Assembly.

Though the focus of the G20 meeting was supposed to address the ways to recover the western economy – the Zionist stooges, Obama, Sarkozy and Brown spent their entire opening speeches on the ‘Iranian bogey’ created by Israel as the major threat to its nuclear supremacy in the Middle East.

 Barack Hussein Obama demanded: “To put it simply: Iran must comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions and make clear it is willing to meet its responsibilities as a member of the community of nations. We have offered Iran a clear path toward greater international integration if it lives up to its obligations, and that offer stands. But the Iranian government must now demonstrate through deeds its peaceful intentions or be held accountable to international standards and international law….”

In other words, Obama was telling the world – Dont’ mind if the US (with armed forces inside over 145 foreign countries) and Israel (a Zionazi occupation) have been carrying out the military use of the nuclear technology – it’s a future nuclear Iran which poses the threat to the world security. He also threatened that a military action is on the table if the Iranians refuse. Israel Lobby’s proxy, Hillary Clinton was more clear on how much Obama administration has Israeli tongue in its mouth: “I don’t believe Iran can convince the US and other world powers that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes”.

Sarkozy, the former MOSSAD informer followed Obama: “All the attempts that we have made to offer a negotiated solution to the Iranian leaders without any success, which what has been revealed today is exceptional. Following the enriching plant of Natanz in 2002, it is now the Qom one which is revealed. It was designed and built over the past several years in direct violation of resolutions from the Security Council and from the IAEA. I am expecting from the IAEA an exhaustive, strict, and rigorous investigation, as President Obama just said.”

Zionist Brown said: “Let the message that goes out to the world be absolutely clear: that Iran must abandon any military ambitions for its nuclear program.”

Dr. Ahmadinejad, in his with Larry King on Friday blasted these three Zionist puppets (watch three videos at the end of this post) by saying: “We did not expect Mr. Obama within less than 48 hours, to basically violate the commitment he spoke of at the United Nations (in which Obama called for international unity for attacking the world’s challenges).” As far Sarkozy and Brown statements were concerned, Ahmadinejad told Larry King that they don’t bother him because those leaders are still living inside the bygone colonial period. In response to a question regarding the USrael proposed future UN sanctions against Iran – Dr. Ahmadinejad replied that the age of sanctions is gone – as the result of the global economy. He said that such sanctions have been there for years but they could not stop Iranian progress in many fields and becoming a regional powerhouse.

According to senior US officials that the unfinished enrichment facility, declared by Tehran recently to the IAEA – was known to Washington since Bush era – and the French intelligence officials were also aware of the facilitity for months.

On September 26, Iraqi president Jalal Talabani, told the leaders of the six powers dealing with their ‘Iranphobia’ (the US, Russia, china, France, Britain and Germany): “The Iranian leadership has explained that the bomb is against Islam because it kills innocent people. So they said openly that they are not for having the bomb but only the use of technology”. He also warned that Iraq will never permit any country the use of its land or sky to attack Iranian nuclear facilities.