Turkey-Israel drifting apart

All eight Turkish military personnel including two high-ranking officers, allegedly involved in a plot to assassinate Turkish deputy prime minister Bulent Arinc – were arrested in Ankara but later released. They are suspected to be member of the secret underground subversive organization Ergenekon, with links to Israeli Mossad and some Crypto-Jew elites. The group have been plotting to unseat the Islamist party AKP government which came into power as result of its sweeping victory in parliamentary election 2002. A week earlier, Lt. Col. Ali Tatar committed suicide after police came to arrest him concerning assassination plot involving Ergenekon investigation. Some of the other military officers who took their lives instead of facing the music – include, Gen. Hursit Tolon, Col. Belgutay Varimli, Col. Tanju Unal, Col. Birol Atkan, Major Abdulkarim Kirca, Major Muzafar Tekin, Captain Olgan Ural, and so on.

Last year, a group of Jews and anti-Islam secularist thugs under the leadership of Turkish rabbi, Tuncay Guney, aka Daniel T. Guney and Daniel Levi and code-named “Ipek” or “Silk” – an agent for the Ergenekon – staged a failed coup against Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government. While some of the traitors were arrested, Guney escaped to Canada, where he functions as a Rabbi at a Toronto Synagogue from where he preaches on post his website, Israeli propaganda filth against Muslims - as to Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper’s the only hate crime is: “Criticism of Israel is the old-fasioned anti-Semitism”.

In 1998, the Arab-hating Jewish ‘Islamophobe’ Daniel Pipes described the relationship between Turkey and Israel “as the ‘birth of a new Middle East alliance”.

Overall, the great majority of Turkey’s new generations have not forgotten the role of Crypto-Jews played in the dismantling of Ottoman Khilafat and Armenian genocide which they blamed on Muslim Turks. Muslims make 99.7% of total Turkey’s population.

The other day, Jeremy Salt published an article, titled Turkey\’s Welcome Voice of Suppot, in which he wrote:

Is Turkey’s relationship with Israel going through a rocky patch or has it passed the point of no return?

The two decades between the military coup of 1980 and the electoral success of the AKP in 2002 marked the high point of the relationship between Turkey and Israel. Constitutional life in Turkey was not resumed until 1983, with some banned politicians prevented from returning to the political arena for several years after that. The continuing strength of the military in politics ensured the stability of the ‘defence’ relationship with Israel. From the late 1980s to the late 1990s all the centre-right governments in power endorsed the relationship with Israel. Between 1994 and 1997 the two countries signed 19 agreements, mostly dealing with ‘defence’ matters. Twelve of them were initialled during the Prime Ministership of the Islamist Necmettin Erbakan, who was finally squeezed out of power in 1997 at the tail end of a ‘soft’ or ‘post modern’ coup by the military. It is certain that Erbakan, a strong Islamist and critic of Israel, would never have willingly gone along with these agreements. They were more or less imposed on him. Furthermore, they were signed by the chief of staff and not the Defence Minister and never ratified by parliament, because of a confidentiality clause signed by previous Prime Minister Tansu Çiller in 1994, which prevented parliamentarians from knowing the detail of what was in them. In the views of critics within the AKP party, the agreements are therefore unconstitutional.

In the context of the relationship with the US, in 2003 the Turkish parliament voted against allowing Turkish territory, ports and military bases to be used for the opening of a second front in Iraq. Colin Powell was visibly irritated. Signals were sent out that unless Turkey cooperated with the US against Iraq the Kurdish question would be activated. Indeed, the US and Britain had already created a difficult situation for Turkey by creating a ‘safe haven’ for the Iraqi Kurds without taking the responsibility for policing it.

Since its first election the AK party has consolidated its hold as the governing party. It has brought substantial change to the country’s foreign policy profile. The close relationship with the US and the close relationship and the close if difficult relationship with the EU both continue, but Turkey is also striking out on its own. More confident of its place in the world, it seems no longer willing to play the western game in the Middle East. It has normalised its relationship with Syria to the point where it is now planning joint military exercises with Syria. As for Iran Turkey is not buying into the campaign of sanctions and exclusion orchestrated by the US for the benefit of Israel, Erdogan remarking recently that Iran was Turkey’s ‘friend’. On the question of Palestine Erdogan has spoken out forcefully and consistently. He says he has the people behind them and there is no doubt that he is right.

Turks have been disgusted by Israeli and western violence in the Middle East since the attack on Iraq in 1991 and the massive civilian toll caused by war and sanctions which followed. They were outraged by Israel’s attack on Lebanon in 2006, especially by the killing of hundreds of children, so it was no surprise that their anger boiled over again during the Israeli onslaught on Gaza from December 2008 to January 2009….”

Iranians’ Purim2!

The Jesus in Holy Qur’an may be a preacher of love and peace – but in the Bible he is full of hatred and vengeance. Well a sort of the message Allan J. Kuperman delivered to Barack Obama on Christmas Eve: “Incentives and sanctions will not work , but air strikes could degrade and deter Iran’s bomb program at relative little cost or risk (to Americans fighting as an Israel proxy war) and therefore worth to try. They should be precision attacks, aimed only at nuclear facilities, to remind Iran of many other valuable sites that could be bombed if it were foolish enough to retaliate (against Israel).” And I bet Allan has the appropriate attack date for the proposed America’s percision bombing of Iran’s civilian targets, similar to Israeli military tactics – the Purim 2010, which falls on February 28 – Jewish celebration of the murder of 72,000 innocent non-Jewish Persians on the orders of Queen Esther, over 2000 years ago.

Christian Barack Obama cannot ignore Allan’s call for “Wipe Iran off the Map” – simply as some warmongering Jew’s rant. The Anti-Christ is supported in his Iranian Holocaust by such prominent Islamophobes Christians such as Rev Pat Robertson, Rev. John Hagee (he teaches that it’s God’s will that Americans fight and die for the Anti-Christs), Chuck Colson, and Richard land.

In 2007, 16 US intelligence agencies produced a report (NIE) on Iran’s nuclear program concluding that Tehran stopped all activities related to the possible use of its nuclear program for military purpose – in 2003. This was a slap on the face of pro-Israel Bush administration. Rather than painting Islamic Iran as a rogue, irrational nation, determined to join the club of nations with the bombs (Israel, India, the US, Britain, France, Russia, China, Pakistan and S. Korea), the National Intelligence Estimate stated: “Iran’s decisions are guided by a cost benefit approach rather than a rush to weapon irrespective of political, economic and military cost.” However, as expected, the ZOG in Washington was not ready to give up its Zionist spin. Bush’s national security adviser, Stephen Hadely, told the press: “NIE has confirmed that we were right about Iranian threat (to Israel).”

Former CIA counterterrorism official (1976-92), Philip Giraldi, has confirmed that the document published ob December 14 by the Times of London, claiming that Tehran plans to do experiments on a “neutron initiator” for an atomic weapon – was fabricated by either British or Israeli intelligence agencies.

Like Zionist propaganda lies in case of Iraq’s nuclear bomb program in the 2001-2002, now the same lies are directed towards Islamic Iran to prepare the West to fight another bloody war against another Muslim country for the dominance of Zionist entity. raqi nukes and Osama Bin Laden’s involvement in 9/11 have not yet been proven as yet. Same goes for Iran’s nuclear program for military purpose. Tehran, Peking, Moscow and Ankara all have repeatedly denied Israeli allegations. Both Iranian president and country’s spiritual leader have repeatedly called for nuclear free zone in the Middle East and end to all nuclear bombs in the world, which they consider ‘evil’ according to Islamic teachings.Furthermore, it’s proven that since 1960s, nuclear bombs have lost their capability to win a war – as is the case with the US in Aghanistan, Iraq; Russia in Chechnya; Israel in Gaza and Lebanon; India in Kashmir and against Moists; Britain in Northern Ireland and Pakistan in Waziristan. However, nuclear bombs have proven to be a good detterent – and Iran, like S. Korae should have one to keep Israeli bully in its place.

The Zionist propaganda lies resulted in US attack on Iraq on Purim 2003 (March 18, 2003) – and now a similar of slaughter of million of innocents people in Iran could be repeated on the eve of Purim 2010 – as a belated Christmas present from Barack Obama for the Zionist homicidals.

Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of Treasury under Reagen administration, wrote an article, titled Israel Rules, in which show the Jewish lobby grip over America.

“The US, the world’s greatest supporter of terrorism, is the main financier of terrorist groups that stage attacks within Iran, and US money succeeded in financing protests against Pppppresident Ahmadinejad’s re-election and in dividing the ruling Islamic clerics. It was american money, weapons, and diplomatic cover that enabled the Israeli crimes against the Lebanese people during 2006 and against Palestinian civilians in Gaza during 2008-2009, crimes documented in Goldstone Report.

Iran has never interfered in US internal affairs, but the US has a long record of interfering in Iranian affairs. In 1953, the US overthrew Iran’s popular secularist prime minister, Mohammed Mosaddeq and installed a puppet who tortured Iranians who desired political independence. Despite this and other American offenses against Iran, Ahmadinejad has repeatedly expressed Iran’s interest to be on friendly terms with United States only repeatedly to be rebuffed. The US wants war with Iran in order to expand US world hegemony.

In the second decade of 21st century, America’s Zionist wars against Islam will expand. America’s wars on behalf of Israel’s territorial expansion will complete the bankruptcy of America. The Treasury’s bonds to finance the US government’s enormous deficit will lack for buyers. Therefore, the bonds will be monetized by the Federal Reserve. The result will be rising rate of inflation. The inflation will destroy the dollar as world reserve currency, and the US will no longer be able to pay for its imports. Shortages will appear, including food and gasoline, and “Superpower America” will find itself pressed to the wall as a third world country unable to pay its debts (mostly to China).

America has been brought low, both morally and economically, by its obeisance to the Israel Lobby. Even Jimmy Carter, a former President of United States and Governor of Georgia recently had to apologize to Israel Lobby for his honest criticisms of Israel’s inhuman treatment of the occupied Palestinians in order for his grandson to be able to run for a seat in Georgia state Senate.

This should tell the macho superpower American tough guys who really run “their” country.”

Women in Islam and Society

Not long ago – Professor John Esposito (Georgetown University) wrote an article, titled Muslim Women Reclaiming Their Rights, It’s was a good try by John Esposito to debunk some of the anti-Islam lies usually repeated by pro-Israel ISLAMOPHOBES almost every day in the Zionist-controlled western mainstream media. However, while blaming Muslim societies for being oppressive towards female gender, such as lack of education, lack of prominant role at mosques, segregation of sexes at community gatherings, lack of women leadership, financial dependency, etc. – he conveniently ignor the fact the women in Judeo-Christian world were living in worse conditions than that until they dropped the religion for Bikini.

John Esposito agrees with Israeli Hasbara (propaganda) rant about Saudi Arabia’s ban on ‘women driving’ but admits that majority of Saudi wives are much better off than their counterparts in the West (an certainly in Israel where women are not allowed to own property under Orthodox Jewish law) – “Saudi women own 70% of savings in Saudi banks and own 61% of private firms in Kingdom, they own much of the real estate in Riyadh and Jeddah and can own and manage their own business, but they’re sexually segregated…”

He also admit that politically, in some Muslim countries, Muslim women are more advanced than many so-called ‘civilized’ western countries:

“While women cannot vote in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan (they just voted in the recent US conducted fraud election in Afghanistan), in almost every other Muslim country they do vote and run for political office, serve in Parliament and serve as head of State or vice-president in Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia and Bangladesh”.

“In Iran, where women must cover their hair and wear long-sleeved, ankle-length outfits in public (men are also not allowed to wear shorts in public), they constitute the majority of university students, hold professional positions (USrael’s favorite Iranian leader Mir Mousavi’s wife is a professor) and serve in parliament. A woman is vice-president in this Islamic Republic.” In addition to that Dr. Ahmadinejad’s government has three cabinet ministers. Contrary to that the no woman has held the position of President or Vice-president in the history of the US. France, Russia, and Australia are in the same boat. Germany just got its first woman Chancellor.

John Esposito quotes results of several surveys which show that in great number of Muslim-majority – both men and women believe in the equality of genders within Islamic guidlines: Muslims in Indonesia (90%), Iran (85%) and Saudi Arabia (61%), Turkey, Lebanon and Bangladesh are in favor of equal legal rights for both sexes – while in Malaysia (90%), Turkey (86%), Egypt (85%) and Suadi Arabia (69%) believe that all jobs should be accessible to bothe sexes based on their qualification. Women should be allowed to vote independent of male influence, Turkey (93%), Bangladesh (90%), Islamic Iran (89%), Indonesia (80%), Jordan (76%), Pakistan (67%) and Saudi Arabia (56%).

Women status in Islam vs Judo-Christianity can be summarize as – While Bible project a woman born in sin, Holy Qur’an says both male and female children are born pure. Woman is so despised in Christianity that priests and popes are not allowed to marry (though they have been found sexually abusing youth and Nuns). Judaism doesn’t give wife the right to divorce her husband while Holy Qur’an awards woman the right to marry or divorce of her own choice. Women in Judaism and Christianity are not entitled for inheritance while Holy Qur’an commands inheritance for widows and daughters. Bible forbids women to receive religious education while Islam more emphsizes on women education. Under Judo-Christian law, a women cannot stand witness without the consent of her father or husband while in Islam, a woman is allowed to be a witness with the exception of a few jurisdictions. A Judo-Christian woman involved in adultry is commanded to be put to death, even by burning her alive (Leviticus 21:9 and Genesis 38:24). A Jewish wife is not allowed to help her husband in distress (Deut. 25:11-12 and 23:1). If a woman gave birt to a daughter, she becomes impure (Leviticus 12:2 and 12:5, Psalms 51:3-5), and so on.

Rev. Roland de Vaux summarized Judo-Christianity’s attitude towards women rights: “The social and legal position of an Israelite wife was inferior to the position a wife occupied in the great countries round about. All the texts show that Israelites wanted mainly sons to perpetuate the family line and fortune, and preserve the ancestral inheritance. A husband could divorce his wife; woman on the other hand could not ask for divorce. The wife called her husband Ba’al or Master; she also called him Adon or Lord; she addressed him, in fact, as a slave addressed his master or subject, his king…..The wife doesn’t inherit from her husband nor daughters from their father. A vow made by a girl or a married woman needs, to be valid, the consent of the father or husband and if this consent is withheld, the vow is null and void. A man has the right to sell his daughter. Women were excluded from the succession…..”

Interestingly, sometimes, these bigots have brought more damage to their own faith communities while opposing Islam. For example, till 2005, Jewish and Catholic communities in Ontario (Canada) had their religious arbitration bodies to deal with family laws. However, when some Muslim groups (Canadian Islamic Congress, Islamic Institute of Civil Justice, etc.) campaigned for similar religious options – hell got loose with headlines in the Zionist-controlled media: “Canada goes Islamic”. Even the government-appointed commission headed by former Ontario Attorney General, Marion Boyd, recommended that Muslims in Canada be allowed to establish Shari’ah-based tribunals similar to Jewish and Catholic bodies. However, Ontatio premier Dalton McGuinty response on September 11, 2005 to Boyd report was blunt: “There will be no Shari’ah law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario.” As a result, both the Jewish and Catholic communities lost their religious privileges. The Islamophobes was stupid enough not to recognize the fact that Islamic Shari’ah is not just about divorce, polygamy, veil or child support – Islamic Shari’ah also guides Muslims in governance, war, crime punishments and human-rights. The damage from anti-Islam propaganda in this case made even Steven Shulman, regional director of Canadian Jewish Congress (a pro-Israel Jewish lobby group) and Frank Dimant, executive vice-president B’nai Brith Canada protested against Dalton McGuinty’s decision.

Finally, I would like to end this post by Professor Nurit Peled-Elhanan (Hebrew University) famous statement she made during her address to European Parliament in 2005: “The so-called free world is affraid of Muslim womb”.