Monthly Archives: February 2010

Turkish-Iran alliance haunts Zionist leaders

“Turkey believes Iran has equal rights with all other countries to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes,” said Ahmet Davutoglu, Turkish Foreign Minister, in a press conference in Ankara on February 3, 2010.

On the same day, the UN Nuclear Watchdog (IAEA) first time reported its agreement with Israeli hoax “Tehran may develop a nuclear-armed missile” – Ahmet Davutoglu reiterated Ankara’s stand in favour of a resolution of the on-going dispute over Iran’s neclear program through diplomatic means. He briefed US Undersecretary of State, William J. Burns (a pro-Israel Zionist) who was in Ankara on a regional tour of the region to seek help from Lebanon, Syria, Turkey and Baku in pushing “crippling” sanctions against Islamic Iran over its disputed nuclear program. Glyn Davies, US ambassador at UN and IAEA was also in the town to convince Turkish foreign ministry of the first-ever IAEA Smoking Gun against Iran’s nuclear program.

On last Thursday, there was an interesting Q/A between US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Congressman Steve Israel (R- NY) in the Israeli Knesset (Oops! I mean at the Congressional Committee):

SI: “I am concerned about where Turkey is going because it’s weakening international efforts to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons, defending Tehran’s position and acting irresponsibly?”

HC: “Turke supports Iran, because – “Turkey shares a long border with Iran and has religious, commercial and cultural ties with that country, it opposes Iran’s aggressive policies. US government has worked very hard to persuade Turkish government to pressure Iran, which is expected to respond to the demands of United States soon.”

SI: “I am concerned about Turkey’s strained relations with Israel, the Cyprus problem and Turkey’s illegal occupation (Turkish Cyprus) and Turkey’s stance regarding the mass killing in Darfur.”

HC: “Turkish government has been critical of country of Israel for humanitarian reasons because of Israel’s Gaza offensive. Turkey has been engaged in an assertive foreign policy in an effort to solve its problem with Armenia”.

SI: “Would United States review its relation with Turkey in light of Turkey’s review of its relation with the US and the rest of the world (Israel)?”

HC: “As NATO members, both the US and Turkey work together in the areas from Balkans to Afghanistan and share an important partnership and mutual strategic interests”. Turkey has 1,755 troops serving with NATO’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Ankara also provides training to Karazi’s security forces in Turkey and Afghanistan.

SI: “What is US government’s response to Turkish government’s intolerance towards its Christian minority and it has confiscated Christian properties”.

HC: “Washington has asked Ankara to reopen the Greek Orthodox seminary in Heybeliada, closed in 1971 and protect property right of the minorities”. However, Hillary Clinton, as a Christian, did have the courage to tell Steve Isral how badly Christian minority is persecuted in Israel – from demolition of churches to spitting on the priests.

In a recent interview, James Jeffrey, US ambassador in Ankara, justified Turkey’s 1974 military intervention into Turkish-Cypriot region in northern Cyprus to protect Muslim Turkish population in response to a military coup intended to annex Cyprus with Greece.

Herzliya Conference Vs Davos Conference on Racism

“My great lesson from Auschwitz is whoever wants to dehumanize any other, must first be dehumanized himself. The oppressors are no longer really human, whatever uniform they wear,” Hajo Meyer, a Geman Auschwitz survivor, anti-Zionist activist and author of book “The End of Judaism: An Ethical Tradition Betrayed”.

“Zionism is fascism, exactly the same as Nazism. The terminology is slightly different, like the tribal affiliations, but in essence they are identical,” Roger Tucker, publisher of One Democratic State.

The 10th Herzliya Conference was held on January 31 – February 3, 2010 at the Campus of the Inter-Disciplinary Center Herzliya in Israel. It’s an annual event organized by Danny Rothschild – in which the Israeli government officials, military leaders and Zionist politicians, military strategists and academics around the world gather to discuss and share their point of views on how to help the Zionist colonial empire in the Middle East to survive and bully the other countries in the region. This year, the speakers included Israeli president Shimon Peres, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Gen. Ehud Barak (Israel’s defense minister), Brig. Gen. Binyamin Ben-Eliezer (Israel’s minister of industry), Uzi Arad (national security adviser to Bibi), Tzipi Livni (leader of opposition in Knesset), Elliot Abrams (former senior member of Bush administration), Arthur C. Brooks (president of  American Enterprise Institute), Richard Haass (president CFR and a senior adviser to Obama), Lt. Gen. Dennis D. Cavin (Vice-president International Air and Missile and Defence Initiatives, Lockhead), James B. Cunningham (US ambassador to Israel), Dr. Martin Kramer (an authority on Islam and the Middle East at Harvard University), Raymond Walter Kelly (New York City Police Commissioner), Jose Maria Aznar (former prime minister of Spain), Dr. Martin Bartak (minister of defense, Czech Republic), Elmor Brok (German member of European Parliament), Dr. Mikhail Chlenov (president of the Jewish Federations, Russia), Salam Fayyad (Mahmoud Abbas’ prime minister), and several dozens others.

The obvious and main issue discussed in the conference was – how to prevent Iran going nuclear. The second issue was – how to proceed with the peace process on Israeli terms. The third issue was – how to defeat world-wide anti-Israel campaign.

Gen. Benny Ganz, the deputy chief of staff of Israel Occupation Force (IOF) summarized the military situation in the region as – “The Syrian arena is contained; Lebanon is peacefull but still has close links with Syria; the Southern Lebanese villages have been supplied with weaponry which Lebanese government has allowed and it would be responsible when Israel is faced with the danger; Gaza is peaceful since Operation Cast Lead, but Hamas is smuggling arms and the situation is volatile; the West Bank is peaceful post Operation Defensive Shield; the borders with Jordan and Egypt are peaceful. Egypt is controlling arms smuggling which begins in Iran and Iran’s long-range missiles and its nuclear ambitions are problematic”.

Professor Dr. Martin Kramer told his audience that the greatest threat Islam poses to the West and the Zionist entity is – not Al-Qaeda or Palestinian resistance, but – Fertility! 

“When you get below a median age of 20, you’re talking about places where Islamist radicalization is taking place on a massive scale.  The biggest radicalizer is fertility hovering at 6, 7% and masses of economically superfluous young men of fighting age between 15-29…If a state can’t control these young men, then someone else will…Radical Islam is a way for the superfluous sons to enter history…… Israel’s blockade of Gaza is one way to accomplish this problem…”

Professor Nurit Peled-Elhanan (Hebrew University) while addressing the European Parliament in 2005, had exposed ‘Islamophobe idiots’ like Martin Kramer when she said: The so-called free world is affraid of the Muslim womb.

When Iranian president Dr. Ahmadinejad exposed Israel’s racist nature in his speech at UN-sponsored Durban Review Conference on Racism in Geneva on April 20, 2009 – he did not call for the extermination of Jewish population as Martin Kramer has suggested for the Muslims. In Ahmadinejad case, most of the delegates representing the western ZOGs walked out of the conference in protest – but none of those ZOGs has condemned Kramer’s racist remarks.

Mohammed Said has called the Harvard University to take stand against racism of all kind and punish professor Martin Kramer for his racist statement.

“One might think that Kramer would realize how blatantly “Nazi-like” his solution is, and try to limit their reach to his original audience. But no, he actually posted the video of his remarks on his Web site! Meanwhile, there has been no response from Harvard. Perhaps that is no surprise, given Harvard’s silence when Hebah Ismail, a Harvard law student who planned to study the Bedouin human rights situation, was recently expelled from Israel. According to the Harvard Political Review, Ismail passed Israel’s security clearance, and had a letter from the Human Rights Program of Harvard Law School providing details about her research. “But she was a Muslim. Airport security forces at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport routinely use ethnic and religious profiling as an index of suspicion; if you look Arab, if you have an Arabic name or if you wear Muslim clothing, you immediately become suspect.” Yet Harvard’s Human Rights Program has remained completely silent.”

Israeli push for “crippling” Iran sanctions backfired

On Thursday, US State Department spokesperson, P.J. Crowley, claimed (Reuters) that Washington doesn’t want to impose “crippling sanctions” against Tehran over its nuclear program – as those would have “significant impact on Iranian people”. Crowley was shedding crocodile tears for the Iranian people who have suffered at the hands of US administrations and Zionist entity for over 50 years in the past. Some officials in the White House also fear that a further round of sanctions against Islamic-regime in Tehran will backfire as more and more so-called “anti-Ahmadinejad regime” Iranians would join the anti-US-Israel majority.

The hypocrisy of Obama administration is amazing. Only a few days ago – Hillary Clinton made AIPAC’s day by saying that she expect a “crippling” sanctions against Iran to be approved by UNSC within next few weeks. Earlier in a conference this month, Obama said that despite Tehran’s denial it’s clear to him that Iran is sursuing a path toward “nuclear weaponization”. He even showed his overjoyment over Russia’s latest indication that Russia is willing to vote for the new sanctions against Islamic Iran over its nuclear program which Tehran has always insisted is for civilian purpose. However, Obama doubted if China is ready to join the pro-Israel gang in the UNSC.

Both Zionist prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and foreign minister Barak Ehud have gone in full gears during last week to convince US administration, Russia and China of Israeli fear of a nuclear Iran. Barak Ehud told US defence secretary Robert Gates in Washington: “Iran is problem not just of Israel, but of the entire world. At this stage it’s important to impose harsh sanctions on Iran in order to prevent its advance toward nuclear weaponry” Benjamin Netanyahu whined on last Monday that new sanctions would have to hit Iran’s vital energy sector. Though Iran is world’s fifth largest oil exporter – it imports 40% of its gasoline from foreign refineries. Tehran is pushing for the completion of six new refineries to go into production by 2012 to get rid of country’s dependence on foreign imports.

The US Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff was in Tel aviv a week ago to assure the paranoid Zionist-regime that Washington takes Iran’s (nonexistant nuclear threat) very seriously and that Israel doesn’t need to take unilateral action, which Israeli military chief has admitted cannot achieve success without America’s active involvement.

The New York Times has reported recently that the huge arms sale to western puppet Arab regime is – so they don’t feel they have to go nuclear themselves and to “calm the Israelis”. The recent years  arms buying spree by the oil-rich Gulf States has hit over US$18 billion include F-15 and F-16 warplanes, Patriot missile batteries, Aegis cruisers, advanced anti-ship and anti-tank missiles, smart bombs and bunker-busters and missile boats. This plus the US is also beefing-up its own missile defense system in the region. All these activities are a de facto  alliance of the US, the Gulf states and the Zionist entity to counter Iran’s growing influence in the region.

As part of Israeli Hasbara spin – The powerful Jewish think tank, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), published an interview with David Albright, president of another Zionist think tank, Institute for Science and International Security, on February 23, 2010. In response to Iran’s Spiritual Leader Ayatullah Ali Khamenei’s (a former president of Iran and holder of PhD in Islamic theology) last week statement that Iran has no intention of building nuclear weapons (as he considers them haram due to their destruction of civilian lives and properties) – the sell-out idiot said that he was sure that ”Iran wants to have a nuclear weapon capability; it wants to be in a position that if it does decide to build nuclear weapons, it can do so relatively rapidly.” As expected, the entire interview, David Albright never mentioned once that in the rgion the only nuclear power, Israel, which is an apartheid colonial empire – has over 240 nuclear bombs and it has invaded every single of its neighbors while Iran has no history of invading its neighbors for the last 100 years.

Iran’s ECSRC director, Hassan Rohani has recommeded that “Iran should pay money to buy nuclear fuel and should not exexchange its low enriched uranium for 20 percent enriched nuclear fuel. Iran’s nuclear program which was started during the Shah regime with the help of US and Israel – was discontinued in 1980s under the orders of Imam Khomeini. It was restarted during the current USrael’s darling, former prime minister Mir-Hossein Mousavi’s administration (1981-89), and all the necessary equipment were provided during former president Ayatullah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani administration (1989-97) and country succeeded domestically producing centrifuges during former president Ayatullah Mohammad Khatani administration (1997-2005).

And finally, the truth from Jacob Hornberger, founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation: “Consider Iran, the reason the neocons (mostly Jewish) hate Iran is the independence Iran shows toward the Empire (controlled by pro-Israel Zionists). If the Iranian regime were to adopt the subservient and obedient attitude toward the Empire that, say, Libyan military strongman and terrorist Mohammar Qadaffi has adopted or, for that matter, that the pro-US Shah of Iran adopted, everything would be hunky dory”.