Israel: In 2006, we played ‘nice guys’

On April 18, 2010 – I posted an article, titled US Embassy in Lebanon: an Israeli Espionage Network. Now, according to Israeli daily YNet (August 27, 2010) that Frederick Hof, a senior adviser to US special envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell, has threatened Lebanese Army Christian commander Jean Kahwajim that should his soldiers kill another Israeli Lt. Col. Dov Harari in a border clash – Israel Occupation Force (IOF) would annihiliate Lebanese army to its last soldier within four hours.

During 34-day Israeli invasion of Lebanon, Lebanese army did not take part for two reasons; first Lebanon doesn’t have a regular army but security force, second Lebanese government knew that Hizbullah fighters can defeat the IOF soldiers – which they did.

In August 2006, an American Christian writer and women right activist, Joanna Francis, posted on her blog; Hezbollah 2, Israel 0:

“Make no mistake about it – the Israelis are getting their tails kicked in Lebanon! Just like they did in May 2000, when Hezbollah sent them scurrying back across the border with their tails between their legs. The Israelis never forgot that stinging defeat and have now demanded a rematch with Hezbollah. And much to their surprise, Israel has already managed to lose the rematch too. Considering the disparity in numbers and weaponry between Israel and Hezbollah, Israel should have achieved a decisive victory by now. But they haven’t. And it doesn’t help their case any that they have had to resort to bombing the entire country, killing women and children, to try to save face. It only makes them look more pathetic. They will never be able to swagger quite so arrogantly again, or instill fear in the groveling leaders of their neighboring countries in quite the same way. The Israelis have been outfoxed at every turn by an irregular army using prehistoric weaponry, with little to no support from neighboring countries (the leaders, that is), but who have proven themselves to be unwavering in their determination. Hezbollah are fighting against the best weaponry American money can buy. And they are winning….”

George Mitchell has recommended to Ben Obama that the United States should no longer pursue a direct confrontation strategy with the Hezbollah, which enjoys majority support among the population, but should seek to isolate it instead. In other words, Washington should pretend to interpret an Israeli war against Lebanon as a police operation against the Hezbollah and refrain from intervening openly. Washington’s new ambassador to Lebanon, Maura Connelly, has been assigned with that job. Saudi King Abdullah has set-aside US$500 million to run a covert operation against Hizbullah.

On his part, de facto President of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas sent a message to the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon asking them not to leave their camps during the offensive slated for this autumn. These instructions correspond to the points of consensus prevailing in Washington. Any attempt to use the Palestinians (mainly sunni) against the Hezbollah (mainly shiite) would be counterproductive for the interests of the United States in Lebanon and could spawn negative effects throughout the region.

In Washington, two powerful Jewish think tanks, Saban Center (Brookings) and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published opposing views in July 2010. According to the first one, Israel should be given complete leeway. The second report recommends, instead, that the Obama Administration should exert pressure on Netanyahu before, during and after the conflict with a view to containing it.

Back in United State, George Mitchell, tried to counter low expectations for renewed Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations by harking back to his experience as a mediator in Northern Ireland.

Hasbara War for US attack on Iran

“In Blood and fire Judea fell, in Blood and fire shall Judia rise,” early Zionist anthem.

31 years ago – Israel Lobby used to project Iran as an “examplary moderate Muslim country” along with Turkey. Then something unexpected happened. The Iranian public rose against the US-Israeli puppet King Reza Shah in 1979, and declared Iran an ‘Islamic Republic’. Both the US and Israel were declared ‘enemies’ of the Iranian people by the Iranian people. That ended the over three decades of Israel-Iran love affairs.

Since 1980s the Jewish vengeance is being carried out against the Islamic Republic by Israel and its poodles in the western world. The Persians had tasted the Jewish vengeance over 2000 years ago, as mentioned in the Jewish Book of Esther when over 70,000 non-Jew Persians were butchered to death on the order of their Jewish Queen Esther.

Now, the same Jewish vengeance is at its peak against the Islamic Republic by exploiting faked documents, leaks and intelligence reports.

In 2007, Dubya Bush authorized funding (US$400 million) for covert black operation to destabilize the pro-Hamas and Hizbullah regime in Tehran. One of the CIA-Mossad-MI6 covert operations reached the peak during the failed ‘Green Revolution’ against the re-election of Dr. ahmadinejad in June 2009. The latest among the long line of covert oprations is the ‘Wikileaks’, which has implicated Tehran supporting the Taliban. In 2001, although, the US had bribed Iranian trained and armed Northern Alliance to provide ground invasion against Taliban.

As Gordon Duff, senior editor Veteran Today has pointed out how CNN, Fox News and other Zionist media networks are airing pro-Israeli anti-Muslim racist propaganda – providing platform to freaks like Glen Beck, Fareed Zakaria, etc. – to create anti-Muslim hysteria for a new war against Muslim world.

Dr. Ahmadinejad’s response to the Wikileals lies, given on CBS was: “We just and only support the Afghan people. We support and we want to strengthen security in Afghanistan. And we think the Afghan people should run their own country. We think the root cause is related to the intervention of the United States and NATO. It’s been for about 20 years that the Americans are interfering directly in Afghanistan”.

While the Ben Obama’s Zionist administration is fooling itself with high moral ground – it is in fact collaborating with Israel Hasbara Committee to prepare the necessary groundwork for an opportunity to launch another unprovoked attack on a member of United Nations.

Beware of another 9/11

With the 9th anniversary of 9/11 fast approaching – I cannot take my mind off the ‘prophetic’ talk between Fox News anchorman John Gibson and columnist Stu Bykofsky in August 2007 in which Stu Bykofsky claimed that America needs a new 9/11 to unite the American people, because they have “forgotten” who the enemy is. The statement was concured by John Gibson.

As the neocons (mostly Jewish) are busy beating the war drums against the Islamic Republic – the coming anniversary could be an appropriate time to fulfil Stu Bykofsky’s prophecy. I wonder if Robert J. Loewenberg, a US-Israel dual citizen and President of the Israeli ‘Institute for Advance Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS) would be releasing his new prophecy as he did on September 11, 2001 which documented the events before they really happened.

Loewenberg in his Op-Eds, titled A War Against the West, released on September 11, 2001 wrote:

Today’s sensational attacks on the U. S., certainly by Muslims who were likely Arabs, are being described as “terrorist” acts by “madmen” for example by Chris Patton, EU. Others seeking an academic perspective along the lines of Sam Huntington, see the attacks as a new bi-polar division between Muslims and Western states and culture.

Our reading at the Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies (Jerusalem and Washington, D. C.) is these attacks are the beginning of a struggle against the West in which the source or cause is primarily the West itself, a group of societies divided internally by an array of factors.

Practically speaking, residents of New York and Washington, D. C. as well as other U.S. cities can now expect routine terrorist assaults ranging from individual terrorist assaults, suicide bombings, germ and chemical attacks in subways and buildings. The existence in the U.S. of legal and tax exempt Arab and Muslim groups, for example CAIR, can be expected to fund and participate in, and most of all to defend these attacks while holding up their opponents as racist.

The strategic, military effect of this struggle against the West, presently most visible in the Middle East and concerning Islam and Arabs, finds its “advanced case” in Israel. Just as Israel has been the object of an Arab undertaking, supported in the West (and most of all in Israel itself and among Jews) to extinguish, cruelly and barbarically to be sure by Arabs and Muslims, Israel’s national existence, the assault today on the U.S. was driven by this same wish or hope to exterminate a nation and its people, and for which the source of support and complicity, grotesquely, resides in the West among its rulers and elites. In other words, what makes this effort a signal one in addition to being genocidal, is that its cause (to be distinguished from its executors) is not Arabs or Muslims or per Huntington, Islam.

Today’s opening assault in a war to destroy Western states is marked by two Western strategies respecting Israel and the West -by Israel and the West.

We in the West, today in New York and Washington, D. C., are paying our price for supporting Israel’s “advanced case” of the affliction of the West. Our “pro-Israel” support of the Jewish state’s attempt to accommodate the Arabs instead of defeating them and establishing rational peace was perhaps a Western attempt to “buy off” our own day of reckoning for failure to face up to the obligations of self-defense and national existence.

If there is a simple, strategic “explanation” of today’s attacks on the U.S. it is this: the U.S. and the West, along with Israel, have insisted, at least since September 1993, that the Palestinian Problem has “no military solution.” At the end of the day, and after all the pundits are talked out in matters of “violence” and “peace” and the rest, the attack on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon (and the other assaults to come in what is now a serious if newfangled war) -which resulted in the hideous and unspeakable deaths of thousands of innocent souls, American citizens (non-Jewish though) who have been effectively betrayed -these deaths were triggered by the peace process in Israel (and other peace processes) and by the very people and institutions of the West that are today making the speeches about “madmen” and “terrorism.” The proximate charge of murder is on the murderers. The wider charge is on the West itself.

So we all know now who was Stu Bykofsky’s ENEMY