Israel needs NATO membership for its survival

On February 8, 2011 – The Jewish Chronicle reported that Ronald Lauder (Reagan’s ambassador to Austria), President of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) has “called for Israel to be admitted into NATO in order to guarantee its survival in the future. NATO membership “would send a strong signal to other countries not to take on Israel”. Interestingly though, it’s the Zionist entity which has invaded all its neighboring countries (Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Gaza and Syria) and not the other way around.

Earlier this month, attending the Herzliya conference in Israel, NATO secretary-general Anders Fogh Rasmussen had called for the alliance to expand cooperation with Israel.

Bruce Riedel, a former Central Intelligence Agency officer, in an article in the September-October 2010 edition of the National Interest had warned that an Israeli attack on Islamic Iran would be a “disaster in the making”, and recommended that Israel should join NATO and benefit from its nuclear umbrella. Israel is known to be the only nuclear power in the Middle East with estimated 240-400 nuclear bombs.

Spain’s former Prme Minister, Jose Maria Aznar (1996-2004), is listed as an “Author” on Israel Hasbara Committee’s list – wrote an article for The Times (June 17, 2010), titled If Israel goes down; we all go down. He wrote: “Israel is our first line of defence in a turbulent region that is constantly at risk of descending into chaos; a region vital to our energy security owing to our overdependence on Middle Eastern oil; a region that forms the front line in the fight against extremism. If Israel goes down, we all go down”.

I must say, Ronald, is honest to admit that after Jewish army’s military humiliation in Lebanon in 2006, Israel has lost its ‘fear deterrent’.

The idea of the Zionist entity joining NATO came from a 2005 study by Hoover Institution at Stanford University (a Zionist think tank) which said: “We want to be clear on one point. Much of the recent discussion in the West about Israel and nato has focused on a possible peacekeeping or monitoring role for Alliance forces in connection with a possible Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement. But what some Israeli strategic thinkers are starting to discuss  – and what we are addressing here  – is something different, namely an upgraded strategic relationship between Israel and Euro-Atlantic institutions like nato and the eu that would lead to increasingly closer ties and could include eventual membership.

Turkey is only Muslim country among NATO’s 28 members. Turkey has diplomatic, military exchange and trade relations with the Zionist state since 1950. Irrespectic of pro-Palestine rhetoric and criticism of the Zionist-regime – Turkey is still maintaining its diplomatic relation with Tel Aviv. Therefore, Israel doesn’t expect a military attack from Turkey. Same goes for Egypt and Jordan. Though Israel occupies Syrian Golan Heights, Damascus has no military muscles to attack Israel, otherwise it could have done that during the past 40 years. Iran is too far away and has never attacked its neighbors for the last 100 years. This leaves Lebanese Islamic Resistance Hizbullah – which has already inflicted military defeat on Israeli army, in 2000 and 2006. Now, Hizbullah has become politically more dangerous for Israel as the new Lebanese government owes its existence to Hizbullah. It doesn’t mean that Hizbullah will attack Israel but Israel fears that Hizbullah will not stop its military resistance against Israel until it liberates the remaining Lebanese territory under Israeli occupation (Shebaa Farms and Northern Ghajar).

It’s due to fear of Hizbullah that Israel wants to join NATO, so that in future, Israeli war against Hizbullah would be fought by NATO’s 28 members along with the Jewish army.

Who is behind turmoil in Libya?

“So I came back to see him (a General at the Petagon) a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs”—meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office—”today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”, said General Wesley Clark in an interview with DemocracyNow!, March 2, 2007.

Both the former Cuban leader Fidel Castro and Venezuelan senior diplamat hves blamed Washington for creating the terrible situation in Libya in order to invade and occupy the oil-rich country.

“The government of the United States is not concerned at all about peace in Libya and it will not hesitate to give NATO the order to invade that rich country, perhaps in a question of hours or very short days,” Castro wrote in a column published Tuesday by Cuban state news media.

The Zionist poodle, US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton who supported Israeli bloodshed of Arabs in Lebanon (2006) and Gaza (2008-09), was quick to condemn Libyan dictator Qaddafi: “This bloodshed is completely unacceptable”.

Stephen Lendman, an American writer and radio show-host – in an interview with Iranian Press TV, said: “When NATO, when an ally is being attacked, you don’t get reports in the US media, they’re suppressed. It was wall to wall Egypt when those protests were going on. It’s wall to wall Libya now with the protests going on. I smell a rat. Again I despise Gaddafi. Libyans deserve much better than him. They have for many years. But I suspect that Washington is doing the pushing”.

It’s interesting to note that the same American Jewish lobby groups which first supported Hosni Mubarak’s regime and later the take-over of pro-Israel military junta in Cairo – are now supporting the regime-change in Libya.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has thrown its support behind the pro-democracy protests and has announced its readiness to send humanitarian aid to the victims of Qaddafi’s military crackdown. Tehran has also announced that it would make every effort to determine the fate of the missing Lebanese Shia leader Imam Moussa al-Sadr, Mehmanparast concluded. Imam Moussa al-Sadr went missing during an official visit to Tripoli to meet with officials from the government of Gaddafi in August 1978. It is widely believed in Lebanon that al-Sadr, the founder of Lebanon’s Amal movement, was kidnapped by the order of senior Libyan officials. Accompanied by two of his companions, Mohammed Yaqoub and Abbas Badreddin, Sadr was scheduled to meet with Libyan officials. In 2008, the Beirut government issued an arrest warrant for Qaddafi over Sadr’s disappearance.

Rep. Peter King: ‘IRA terror supporter to judge Muslims’

“I am willing to be called a bigot if that’s what takes to target Muslim community,” Rep. Peter King, Think Progress, December 20, 2010.

Congressman Peter King (R-NY), chairman the House Homeland Security committee is pushing Zionist Lobby agenda. He has announced to conduct a hearing to investigate that Al-Qaeda is recruiting members among the American Muslim community, which happens to be US’s largest religious community (over eight millions) and that the Muslims are not patriotic citizen.

For a moment I thought that Peter King must believe that the ‘five dancing Israeli’ arrested on September 11, 2001 including Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, Kip Kinkel, Chris Morris, Jonathan Pollard, Ben-Ami Kadish (arrested and charged with giving top secret nuclear information and details about the US Patriot Missile to an Israeli agent), convicted Larry Franklin (AIPAC member), Douglas Feith, Henry Kissinger, Jared Lee Loughner who shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and the recently arrested Jewish Taliban, Oded Orbach, were all Muslims.

Keith Ellison is first and only Muslim Congressman and he is an Afro-American convert to Islam. He doesn’t hold dual citizenship while there hundreds of American Jews at high government and other sensitive agencies (Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and many others), who hold US-Israel dual citizenship. There is not a single Muslim in high office who holds citizenship other than the US. So who are patriotic, Jews or Muslims?

According to Tom Parker, Amnesty Internalional Policy Director for Terrorism, Counterterrorism and Human Rights: “Peter King was a high profile supporter of the Provisional IRA for almost twenty years … This is a guy who is happy to bully other people when he has a whole crowd of skeletons in his closet on this issue.” 

Peter King forged links with leaders of the IRA and Sinn Fein in Ireland, and in America he hooked up with Irish Northern Aid, known as Noraid, a New York based group that the American, British, and Irish governments often accused of funneling guns and money to the IRA. At a time when the IRA’s murder of Lord Mountbatten and its fierce bombing campaign in Britain and Ireland persuaded most American politicians to shun IRA-support groups, King displayed no such inhibitions. He spoke regularly at Noraid protests and became close to the group’s publicity director, the Bronx lawyer Martin Galvin, a figure reviled by the British. Peter King only distant himself from Europe’s most horrible terrorist group not because he converted to Buddhism but due to vocal criticism of American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq in Ireland.

Last year Peter King had claimed that 85% of mosques in this country have extremist leaders and that Muslims in this country were reluctant to help law enforcement. During the Zionists’ jerk-reaction to the proposed Islamic Center near Ground Zero – Peter King said on CNN: “For instance, even this Imam (Feisal Abdul Rauf) himself who wants to construct the mosque at ground zero, he says that the United States was an accessory to 9/11. He refuses to denounce Hamas as a terrorist organization (that’s King’s real problem).”

Here is an example to show the US lawmakers who work for the interests of a foreign government (Israel) than America’s national interests. On January 25, 1995 New York Senator Alfonse D’Amato, who represented a large Jewish constituency strongly supportive of Israel and had a long history of advocating tougher trade policies towards Iran, introduced in the Senate the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Act (Cisa), intended to sever all trade links between the United States and Iran. In support of Israel-Firster D’Amato, Rep. Peter King on February 23, 1995 introduced identical legislation in the House. In a rush to head off the D’Amato and King bills, the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) announced on March 6, 1995 that it had signed a $1 billion contract with the US oil company Conoco to develop the offshore Sirri-A and Sirri-E gas fields. Though, both bills were described by US industry as “an example of an irresponsible commitment to unilateral controls in a world with declining multilateral co-ordination of trade restrictions” – the Jewish Lobby prevailed. On March 15, 1995, Predident Bill Clinton announced to issue an executive order prohibiting contracts similar to that between Conoco and NIOC. Conoco subsequently withdrew from the deal, while stressing that both the Bush and Clinton administrations had periodically been advised of its three years of negotiations on the Sirri fields. The Conoco was the first oil concession granted by Tehran since 1979 Islamic Revolution and came after 16 years of Washington’s anti-Iran campaign to please the pro-Israel Jewish lobbing groups.