On October 21, Guardian carried a ‘Islamophobic’ headline Malaysia goes Islamic for an article written by some armchair ‘expert on Islam’ by the name Mazna Mohamad. The article was picked by most of the Zionist think tanks such as Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Mazna Mohamad’s ‘Islamic credentials’ flies out of window when she wrote: “After Iran or Saudi Arabia, Malaysia’s Shari’ah court system is probably the most extensive in the Muslim world, and the accompanying bureaucracy is not only big but has more bite than the national parliament.” In other words, she doesn’t want a country’s judiciary system to be independent of the Executive, but under the foot of the government. Saudi Arabia and Iran have overwhelming Muslim population (over 98%) – but in Malaysia Muslims make 60.4% of country’s total population of 25 million. The remaining are Buddhist (19.2%), Christian (9.1%), Hindus (6.3%), Chinese traditional religions (2.6%), and unkown. In a country with such religious diversification – it would be impossible to impose the will of the slight Muslim majority over the 40% non-Muslim population – unless it’s a foreign colonial system like Israel.

The Shari’ah court system in Saudi Arabia is not independent of the governing royal family. In Islamic Iran – there is no such thing as the “Shria’h court system”. Everyone is judged under the same laws, which were formulated by the consent of the religious leaders of the minority groups in Iran. The country’s judiciary is independent of both the Majlis (Parliament) and the Executive. It’s responsible only to Iran’s Spritual Leader, Ayatullah Khameini.

The governing party in Malaysia, UMNO, which has ruled the country for the past 50 years – is not an Islamic party but is based on Malayan ethnicity. The major opposition party, PAS, do have ‘Islamic credentials’ and has no significant voting-base with the 40% non-Muslim population, Malayan or non-Malayan.

How much Islam is marginalized in Malaysia by the political leaders – can be judged by the battlecry of “I Malaysia” by the current prime minister Najib Abdul Razak, which could be more appealing to “Islamophobes” than the failed “Islam Hadhari (‘progressive Islam’, whatever, the hack that mean)” slogan of the former prime minister Abdullah Badawi.

It was not the ‘Sharia court’ which ordered Kartika to receive six lashes – but her on free will. She wanted to be punished to clear her guilty conscience as a Muslimah – something secularists like Manza would not understand. PAS’s recent call for the regulation of alcohol created such a storm among the non-Muslim leaders that the issue had to require intervention by top leaders. That even such an issue that has more to do with social life than ‘religious policing’ can be politicized in a predominantly Muslim country shows that the Zionists’ fear of Islamic Shari’ah is not true.

Professor Noah Feldman (Harvard University), is a American Jewish scholar, who writes for the New York Times magazine and is a senior member of the Zionist think tank CFR. In his article, titled Why Shariah?, published in March 2008 by The New York Times – he wrote:

No legal system has ever had worse press (in the West). To many, the word “Shariah” conjures horrors of hands cut off, adulterers stoned and women oppressed. By contrast, who today remembers that the much-loved English common law called for execution as punishment for hundreds of crimes, including theft of any object worth five shillings or more? How many know that until the 18th century, the laws of most European countries authorized torture as an official component of the criminal-justice system? As for sexism, the common law long denied married women any property rights or indeed legal personality apart from their husbands. When the British applied their law to Muslims in place of Shariah, as they did in some colonies, the result was to strip married women of the property that Islamic law had always granted them — hardly progress toward equality of the sexes.

In fact, for most of its history, Islamic law offered the most liberal and humane legal principles available anywhere in the world. Today, when we invoke the harsh punishments prescribed by Shariah for a handful of offenses, we rarely acknowledge the high standards of proof necessary for their implementation. Before an adultery conviction can typically be obtained, for example, the accused must confess four times or four adult male witnesses of good character must testify that they directly observed the sex act. The extremes of our own legal system — like life sentences for relatively minor drug crimes, in some cases — are routinely ignored. We neglect to mention the recent vintage of our tentative improvements in family law. It sometimes seems as if we need Shariah as Westerners have long needed Islam: as a canvas on which to project our ideas of the horrible, and as a foil to make us look good.

In the Muslim world, on the other hand, the reputation of Shariah has undergone an extraordinary revival in recent years. A century ago, forward-looking Muslims thought of Shariah as outdated, in need of reform or maybe abandonment. Today, 66 percent of Egyptians, 60 percent of Pakistanis and 54 percent of Jordanians say that Shariah should be the only source of legislation in their countries. Islamist political parties, like those associated with the transnational Muslim Brotherhood, make the adoption of Shariah the most prominent plank in their political platforms. And the message resonates. Wherever Islamists have been allowed to run for office in Arabic-speaking countries, they have tended to win almost as many seats as the governments have let them contest. The Islamist movement in its various incarnations — from moderate to radical — is easily the fastest growing and most vital in the Muslim world; the return to Shariah is its calling card.

How is it that what so many Westerners see as the most unappealing and premodern aspect of Islam is, to many Muslims, the vibrant, attractive core of a global movement of Islamic revival? The explanation surely must go beyond the oversimplified assumption that Muslims want to use Shariah to reverse feminism and control women — especially since large numbers of women support the Islamists in general and the ideal of Shariah in particular.

To believing Muslims, Shariah is something deeper and higher, infused with moral and metaphysical purpose. At its core, Shariah represents the idea that all human beings — and all human governments — are subject to justice under the law.

On October 20, in a ceremony in New York, the International Women’s Media Foundation (IWMF) awarded the 2009 Lifetime Achievement Award to Israeli English daily Ha’aretz columnist Amira Hass. Amira Hass was born in 1956 in Jerusalem to Jewish communist parents. She is the only Israeli Jewish journalist who has lived both in Gazzah and the West Bank. Following is her the award acceptance speech:

“Allow me to start with a correction. “Ah, how impolite,” you’d rightly think. But anyway, we Israelis are being forgiven for much worse than impoliteness. What is so generously termed today by the International Women’s Media Foundation as my “lifetime achievement” needs to be corrected, because it is failure. Nothing more than a failure. A lifetime failure. Come to think of it, the “lifetime” part is just as questionable. After all, it is about a third of my life, not more, that I have been engaged in journalism. Also, if the “lifetime” part gives you the impression that I am soon going to retire, then this impression has to be corrected, as well. I’m not planning to end soon what I’m doing.

What am I doing? I’m generally defined as a reporter on Palestinian issues. But, in fact, my reports are about the Israeli society and policies, about domination and intoxications. My sources are not secret documents and leaked-out minutes which were taken out of meetings of people with power and in power; my sources are the open ways by which the subjugated are being dispossessed of their equal rights as human beings.

There is still much more to learn about Israel, to learn about my society and about the Israeli decision makers, who invent restrictions such as: Gazan students are not to study in a Palestinian university in the West Bank, some seventy kilometers away from their home. Another ban: children above the age of eighteen are not to visit their Palestinian parents in Gaza, if the parents are well and healthy. If the parents are dying, Israeli order-abiding officials would have allowed a visit. If the children are younger than eighteen, the visit would have been allowed, as well. But on the other hand, second-degree relatives are not allowed to visit dying or healthy siblings in Gaza. It is an intriguing philosophical question, not only journalistic. Think of it. What, for the Israeli system, is so disturbing about reasonably healthy fathers or mothers? What is so disturbing about a kid choosing and getting a better education? And these are but two in a long, long list of Israeli prohibitions.

Also, when I write about the progressively decimated and fragmented Palestinian territory of the West Bank, it’s not just about people losing their family property and livelihood that I write. It’s not only about the shrinking opportunities of people in disconnected, crowded enclaves. It is in fact a story about the skills of Israeli architects. It is a way to learn about how Israeli on-the-ground planning contradicts official proclamations, a phenomenon which collectivizes the acts of all Israeli governments in the past as in the present.

In short, there is so much to keep me busy for another lifetime, or at least for the rest of my lifetime. But, as I said, the real correction is elsewhere. It’s not about achievement that we should be talking here, but about a failure. It is the failure to make the Israeli and international public use and accept correct terms and words which reflect the reality, not the Orwellian Newspeak that has flourished since 1993 and has been cleverly dictated and disseminated by those with invested interests. The peace process terminology, which took reign, blurs the perception of real processes that are going on: a special Israeli blend of military occupation, colonialism, apartheid, Palestinian limited self-rule in enclaves, and a democracy for Jews.

It is not my role as a journalist to make my fellow Israelis and Jews agree that these processes are immoral and dangerously unwise for all of us. It is my role, though, to exercise the right for freedom of the press in order to supply information and to make people know. But as I’ve painfully discovered over the years, the right to know does not mean a duty to know. Thousands of my articles and zillion of words have evaporated. They could not compete with the official language that has been happily adopted by the mass media and is used in order to dis-portray the reality, official language that encourages people not to know. Indeed, a remarkable failure for a journalist.”

On October 21, Amira Hass was interviewed by Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! in which she talked about Jewish occupation of Palestine, Goldstone report and Israel’s 23-day barbaric attack on 1.5 million Native traped inside the tiny Gaza Strip.

According to Amira Hass – the Zionist regime has been using every possible method to make Palestinians surrender and has been quite successful through economical attrition, economical temptations, separation, disconnecting Gaza from the West Bank and by vicious military attacks against Palestinians both in Gaza and the West Bank.

“The peace process and the negotiations have been a joke for the past almost fifteen years. We don’t expect the Israelis will change now their course in the peace – in the negotiation process and agree to things they did not agree so far: dismantling all settlements, not just the unauthorized posts; stopping the scandalous ethnic-cleansing in Jerusalem – East Jerusalem, bringing Gaza back to the Occupied Territories, by – of allowing Gazans to connect back to their brothers in the West Bank,” said Amira.

Robert Bernstein says that Israel is a democracy of seven-million-point-something Israeli citizens. He forgets four million Palestinians, who have to be registered in the Israeli population registry in order to exist. All the Palestinians are registered. He forgot the four million. So what kind of democracy it is, where four million who are in the Israeli Ministry of Interior have to be registered and Israel decides if they are—if they exist? How can you call it a democracy, when half of – when one-third, not to mention the one million Israeli Palestinians, don’t have rights, the same rights? What kind of democracy it is? It is really twisting all facts around. I was surprised to read this article, because it very much sounded – much of it sounded like propaganda of Israeli officials. Parts of it, not all.

Amira Hass believes that Hamas resistance is playing in the hands of Israel by trying to act like Lebanese Islamic Resistance Hizb’Allah – which it cannot be – and that Hamas rocket attacks are for local consumption only.

In 2006 – Michael Lucas 37 (born as Andrei Bregman in Moscow), a Jewish-American porn actor for the last 11 years, while on visit to entertain the Israel Occupation Force (IOF), was quoted: “I will expose the reality that the people of Israel face right now, especially the gay Israelis, who are targeted by the hate of Hezbollah.” Some readers may consider it Lucas’ ignorance of the true story behind the Israeli-Hizbollah conflict – but for the Israeli Habara (propaganda) thugs – it was considered a good public relation (PR) piece. The Israelis do pride themselves for calling Tel Aviv (home to over 250 brothels) – as The Pink City.

In 2008, during a talk at Stanford University, Lucas compared Holy Qur’an to Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

In September 2009, Lucas was granted Israeli citizenship.

On September 16, 2009 – Michael Lucas was honored by the oldest Jewish magazine FORWARD under the heading Pornographic Stimulus Plan: “It’s a free PR (Gay movement) for Israel and it’s much better than the PR they’re getting on the news…”

The largest numbers of porn actors and actresses in the Jewish-American created Hollywood – are Jewish. Sasha Grey 23, has more than 150 porn movies under her belt.

Israel has used pornography in popularizing Holocaust and recruiting foreign Jews in IOF and attacting foreign tourists. Pornography became part of Holocaust during the trail of Eichmann. Books like ‘I Was Colonel Shultz’s Private Bitch’, ‘The House of Dolls’, and the Israeli mass-production of ‘Jewish memoirs showing naked pictures of young Jewish women sexually abused by the Nazi soldiers. In 2007, Israeli filmaker, Ari Libskar, made a documentary film Stalags (German prison camps), based on those pornographic propaganda crap.

Gilad Atzmon, son of one of the two founders of the Zionist entity, wrote in his November 4 article, titled Pornographic Past vs Murderous Present:

“Melissa Katsoulis’ reference to pornography may raise some questions. While pornographic consumption can be realized as an attempt to seek libidinal pleasure through the imagery of others celebrating their symptoms, one may wonder, what kind of satisfaction anyone might seek from the repetition of holocaust memory? Do we look for satisfaction? And if we do, what kind of satisfaction are we exactly? What are the symptoms that are celebrated by the story teller (many of them faked ones, as admitted by Herman Rosenblat on ABC and Irene Weisberg Zisblat in the film ‘The Last Days’. Watch video clips at the end of this post), and what are our symptoms consuming them?

Rather than a singular monolithic belief system promoting a deceptive notion of freedom centered on Jewish pain, what we really want is real pluralism and tolerance that would accept more than just one truth and encourage belief systems to respect each other.

I would maintain that in fact we are the witnesses of an ongoing holocaust in Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. We also witness Israel preparing itself to nuke Iran in the name of Jewish history and Holocaust in particular. In front of our eyes we see the emergence of evil on colossal magnitude, and we are somehow paralyzed by a historical chapter that, in comparison to contemporary Israeli crimes, has less and less significance or relevance….”

American administration’s involvement in the dismemberment became in 1950s, when the country’s first prime minister Liaquat Ali Khan refused to be blackmailed by the American Israel Lobby  – to recognize the Zionist entity. He was assassinated on October 16, 1951 and his assassin shot on the spot in order to erase all clues to the identity of the culprits (CIA, Mossad) behind the murder.

After living under British colonial rule for almost 200 years – The US did not have much difficulty in finding hypocrites in Pakistan – among its British-trained rmy and bureaucracy, sectarian religious leaders, and Qadiani community (a British created Muslim sect whose leadership never accepted the establishment of Pakistan). One of the two Pakistan’s two Muslim-majority neighbors, Iran and Afghanistan – the later has always been under India’s influence. The successive governments in Kabul always played in the hands of India to dismember Pakistan, which brought both India and Afghanistan closer to Israel. Kabul called for the establishment of a seperate state of Pakhtoonistan out of Pakistan’s Frontier province (NWFP) and now provides the military training facilities for RAW-Mossad supported militants involved terrorist activities inside Pakistan.

After the assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan – the US government did not give the people of Pakistan to elect a democratic government of their choice. Washington master-minded all four military coups (Gen. Ayub Khan, Gen. Zial-ul-Haq, Gen. Yahya Khan, and Gen. Musharraf). Pakistan is the only Muslim country which has the honor of two American citizens being installed as ‘prime ministers (Moin Qureshi and Shaukat Aziz, World Bank and Citibank officials)’ without being taking part in the elections during peace-time. Incidently, the Prsident of Kabul, Hamid Karzai (re-elected through US-rigged election) is also an American citizen.

Under the pro-US Taliban rule, Washington used ISI and Saudi funded Wahhabism to create a sectarian war between Pakistan and Iran which share the longest border after Afghanistan. Roy Gutman in his book ‘How We Missed the Story: Osama bin Laden, the Taliban, and the Hijacking of Afghanistan, wrote: “Col. Imam was really the American-trained Amir Sultan Tarar, the commando officer who trained the Mujahideen in camps run by Pakistan and the US. He was sent into Kandhar in 1994 to keep the Taliban going in the right direction but soon he moved to the more ’strategic’ location of Herat, which was to put Pakistan and Iran face to face when Taliban finally got hold of Mazar in 1998 with a massacre to shame all massacres, including the killing of Iranian diplomats in the Mazar consulate at the hands of Sipah Sahaba (a fanatic anti-Shia outfit funded by Saudi Arabia) boys sent in from Pakistan.” After the collapse of Russian occupation in Afghanistan, Col. Tarar was invited at the White House and the father Bush gave him a piece of Berlin Wall with a brass plaque inscribed: “To the one who dealt the first blow”. A few months ago, Col Tarar was quoted as saying: “An operation like that (9/11) needs ground support. I have no doubt it was carried out by the Americans to give bad name to Taliban government as an excuse to topple it.”

Qadianis in Pakistan, like their British colonial created Bahai brothers in Iran – have acted as the willing Zionists in the Muslim world. Peter Chamberlin in his October 30 article, titled “Waging War Upon Ourselves”, wrote:

“The army has allowed American and British intelligence agencies to secretly use India’s RAW and Mossad to manipulate certain adherents of a local religious cult, the Ahmadiyya (rather know as Qadiani by the Muslim-majority), to create a new series of schisms within Pakistani society. The theory seems to gain some validity due to certain facts that apply to many members of the cult – many are embeded within the Pakistani officer corps, a lot of them hold high position in the government bureaucracy and their movement was founded in what is today the epicenter of sectarian terror, around the town of Jhang.

The basic reality of everyday life for Ahmadis within Pakistan make them ideal candidates for recruits in a secret army, especially if the mostly poor Ahmadis are paid exceptionally well – because of religious persecution, they have always had to hide their religious identities; they advocate reunification with India; they prefer British rule over the status quo in Pakistan. If the world was being reordered by the Americans and British in a manner that would reunite India or bring all the Muslim people in Pakistan under the control of one organization that was America-friendly, perhaps also leading to Indian reunification, then surely the Ahmadis and some of their leaders could be counted upon to cooperate in bringing the plan about.

There is no way to document how many of these terrorists that infiltrated NWFP and FATA were Qadianis, but we know for certain that they were all Spiah/Lashkar Jhungvi…… Ahmadiyyas believe that their founder Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (1835-1908) was the Mahdi of Islam, the last incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu and embodiment of the Christian Messiah (Jesus). The followers of Ahmad settled on 1034 acres of land near Jhang in Punjab (Pakistan)…..”

Since submitting to Bush’s doctrine: “Either you’re with US or against US” under Gen. Pervez Musharraf (some Pakistani sources believ that he is a Qadiani by marriage) in October 2001 – 22, 000 Pakistanis have been killed including 2,500 security personnels and 5,900 ‘insurgents’.

Dr. Eqbal Ahmad in his 1998 presentation at the University of Colorado, titled Terrorism: Theirs and Ours explained the western mindset when it comes to “who’re the terrorists?” For example, in the 1930s and 1940s – many leaders of Jewish militias in Palestine (begin, etc) were declared “terrorists” by the British Mandate Authority with reward of 100,000 British pounds – caught dead or alive. Later, as the prime minister of Zionist entity, Begin was given ‘red carpet’ treatment at the White House and the White Hall. From 1969 to 1990 – PLO was the greatest terrorist organization in the eyes of Washington. However, in 1998, when Yassar Arafat agreed to kiss Bibi – he was declared a “man of peace” and awarded with Nobel Peace Prize like Obama. In 1985, President Reagan received a group of Afghan leaders at the White House and praised them: “These are the moral equivalent of America’s founding fathers”. Later, when some of these bearded Afghan leaders tried to establish an independent Islamic State in Afghanistan – they were labelled as “terrorists” – and two of them (President Rabbani and Prime Minister Gulbedin Hykmatyar) took refuge in neighboringIslamic Iran.

On October 18, CIA/Mossad/ISI funded Pakistan-based Jundullah terrorist group targeted a meeting between Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps commanders and and Sunni Balochi tribal leaders inside Iranian Balochistan – killing 42 people including six IRGC commanders. Dr. Ahmadinejad called Asif Zardari and demanded that Jundullah terrorists be apprehended. Pakistan’s former chief of the Army, Gen. Aslam Beg said on October 25 interview that the Jundullah terrorist outfit is backed and financed by the US – and since US occupation forces in Afghanistan face imminent defeat – hence the US trying to instigate sectarian conflict between Tehran and Islamabad, which would prove deadly for the Muslim Ummah. Many analysts suspect that Pakistan’s interior minister Rehman Malik, who has links with CIA and Mossad – is involved in the anti-Pakistan terrorist activities. Both ABC television and Abdul Hamid Rigi (brother of Abdul Malik Rigi, head of Jundullah) have admitted that the group has received training, money and weapons from the US. It’s no secret that both the US and Israel are pouring millions of dollars to destablize Iran and Pakistan – by detaching Balochi region from Pakistan and Iran and block China’s access to the warm water port at Gwadar (Pakistan) which it has leased from Pakistan.

It’s also interesting to note that Barack Obama tried to camoflage America’s obvious military huminliation in Afghanistan by saying at the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention on August 17 – that Taliban are not threat anymore – but it’s the Al-Qaeda insurgency which is killing the US and NATO occupation forces. However, our Zionist Hindu expert at Jewish think tank CFR, Jayshree Bajoria, wrote that one of the major reason behind terrorism in Pakistan is due to Pakistanis’ hatred of India. She also suggested that Pakistan government should crackdown on the veteran Mujahideen leaders such as Jalauddin Haqqani and Gulbedin Hykmatyar, who are actively engaged in supplying fighters in Afghanistan. In other words, Jayshree believes that there is no RAW, Mossad or CIA hands behind terrorism in Pakistan – as these groups believe in Gandhjee’s non-violence!!

“They try to deceive Allah and those who believe – but they only decieve themselves and realize not,” Holy Qur’an 2:9

On October 20, the ‘National Catholic Reporter’ said that Pope Benedic XVI is planning to issue an apostolic decree to attract 400,000 ‘disaffected Anglicans‘, who are not happy with the ordination of women as priests and bishops, the ordination of openly gay clergy and bishops, and blessing of the same-sex union.

Pope Benedict XVI, in 2006, in his notorious lecture in Reginsburg – had compared Christian view that “not acting reasonably is contrary to God’s nature” with an Islamic view, as interprested by an ‘Islamophobe’ Catholic ‘expert on Islam’, Adel Theodore Khoury, that Allah transcends rationality as well as everything else.

The Pope, like many other people considers Islam to be ‘unreasonable’ – because it refuses to mould itself to thw wishes of the elites in order to serve their wordly interests – as Judaism, Christianity and Hinduism have done.

Why would Pope Benedict XVI spread such a lie about Islam – who, otherwise, is bending backward in pursuit of friendly dialogues with the Protestant and Jewish leaders? The most appropriate answer to this question – was given by no other than a Catholic writer and woman right activist in the US – Joanna Francis in her September 19, 2006 article, titled Benedict XVI: Zionist Double Agent, in which she wrote:

“It’s really not difficult to understand why Benedict XVI is encourging emnity between the Catholics and the Muslims. All you have to ask is: cui bono? (who benefits?). The Zionists, of course. The Catholic Church was always their biggest enemy. So naturally the Jews were going to do anything and everything to get it under their control: it took almost 2000 years, but it finally happened in 1958. The Jews pulled off a coup d’eglise with the election of Freemason Angelo Roncalli (Pope John XXIII) to the Papacy. Immediately upon his election, the media began calling Roncalli “Good Pope John”. Be careful when Jewish controlled media praises someone, especially a Catholic, that means that person is working for them. Contrast the media’s love affair with the post-1958 popes with their hatred of all pre-1958 popes, up to and including Pope Pius XII, who was called “a Nazi”……

It should be obvious to everyone now, what we Catholics have figured out that the Vatican is under Zionist control, have been right all along. They labeled us “extremists”, “sadevacantists”, “ultra-right-wingers”, “fascists”, “Nazis”, etc. But when the Jews and their useful idiots have to resort to hurling those epithets at you, it usually mean you’ve hit upon the truth. Well we Catholic “extremists” have the Zionists’ number and we have been calling them on it for a long time. Now, maybe the rest of the brainwashed Christians will wake-up.”

Now back to the topic. YES, Islam is the only religion on the face of the Earth which would make ‘reason’ to a ‘rational thinking individual’. Here are a few examples, to understand which, one doesn’t need a PhD from Oxford University.

1. It’s ‘unreasonable’ to worship more than one Master. Islam commands its believers to worship only one Supreme Deity (Allah) – while for Christians it’s “one-in-three & three-in-one (Trinity)”; for Jews it’s a piece of “holy land (Palestine)”, and for Hindus, it’s at least one god for each day!

2. It’s ‘unresonalbe’ to differentiate people on the basis of colour of their skin, nationality, ethnicity or by birth. Among Muslims, there is division based on their interpretation of Shari’ah – but all of them (both Sunnis and Shias), perform Hajj together. They do pray in sectarian-based mosques, but accept yellow, white, brown and Black people in their sectarian-based mosques. Contrary to that, a Jew is accepted as a Jew, not because he/she follows Talmud (or OT for that matter) but on the bases that he/she was born to a bonafide Jewish mother (many Russian Jew settlers in occupied Palestine are facing that problem). Christians of different denominations – don’t accept Christians of other denomination plus a very few white churches allow fellow Christians who happen to be Blacks. In Hinduism, one is born and dies into one of its four castes.

3. It’s ‘unreasonable’ to treat women as inferior to men. Islam accepts both men and women for equal rewards – but allots them different functions based on the Divine purpose of gender creation. Islam doesn’t judge women inferior based on their birth. Contrary to that – Judaism, Christianity and Hinduism – consider women to be born in “sin” and expect women to serve menfolks in this life as ‘divine slaves’. Islam give a wife the right to demand divorce – but in Judaism the wife doesn’t have such right – nor right to inheritance from her parents or her husband.

4. It’s ‘unreasonable’ and immoral to carry-out mass-murder of innocent people. Islam do allow warfare (Jihad) in certain cases – but doesn’t allow the genocide or destroying enemy’s infrastructure. Judaism, Christianity and Hinduism has no such “checks” – and allows vengeance against enemies, even the co-religionists. The western Christians have killed more than 100 million non-combatants during WW I & WW II alone – While the Communist Jewish elites murdered 60 million Christians and two million Muslims in USSR and Ukraine.

5. It’s ‘unreasonable’ to punish someone for the crimes committed by someone else. Islam teaches that every soul is responsible for his/her actions in this life – and would be rewarded/punished in the next life – irrespective of the gender. In the 1940s, it were Nazis (both Christians and Jews), who killed millions of Gypsies, Christians and Jews – Howeve,  it’s the Muslim and Christian Palestinians who are paying for those Nazis’ crimes.

South African Judge Richard Goldstone (a Zionist Jew) has become the second most popular figure (after Dr. Ahmadinejad), since the publication of UN Human Right Commission Report, usually referred as the “Goldstone Report” – acussing both the occupying State of Israel and Islamic Resistant group Hamas – but mostly the State of Israel – for committing crimes against humainty during the Dec-Jan 2009 Gazzah invasion by Israel. Against all the anti-report and Goldstone’s character assassination by the Zionist thugs – Laat week the UN Human Right Council approved Goldstone report by a majority vote (the US voted against, as expected) and sent it to the UN Security Council for the appropriate action.

Now, the Jewish Lobby is blackmailing the Congress to condemn the findings of Goldstone report concerning Israeli atrocities during its schedule debate on October 3. One of the four member-panel of the UN report, retired Col. Desmond Travers (Irish Army) in an interview with the Harpers magazine (October 29, 2009) confirmed that Hamas did not use civilians as hostages as claimed by Israel. When asked that Israeli claim that its forces (IOF) are the “most moral army in the world” – Col Travers replied: “Given the tactics, the weapon used, and the indiscriminate targeting, I think this is a dubious claim.”

Last week, Bill Moyers interviewd Richard Goldstone (a video clip at the end of this post). Below are some pertinent excerpts from that interview:

Moyers: “Your report, as you know, basically accuses Israel waging war on the entire population of Gaza (1,5 million).”

Goldstone: “That’s correct.”

Moyers: “I mean, there are allegations in here, some very tough allegations of Israeli soldiers shooting unarmed civilians who pose no threat, of shooting people whose hands were shackled behind them, of shooting two teenagers who’d been ordered off a tractor that they were driving, apparently carrying wounded civilians to a hospital, of homes, hundreds, maybe thousands of homes destroyed, left in rubble, of hospitals bombed. I mean there are some questions about one or two of your examples here, but it’s a damning indictment of Israel’s conduct in Gaza, right? “

Gladstone: ” Well, it is outrageous, and there should have been an outrage. You know, the response has not been to deal with the substance of those allegations. I’ve really seen or read no detailed response in respect of the incidents on which we report. “

Moyers: ” Why is that? “

Gladstone: “Well, you know, I don’t know. I suppose people hate being attacked. There’s a knee-jerk reaction to attack the messenger rather than the message. And I think this is typical of that. And of course, a lot of the allegations, I certainly don’t claim anything like infallibility. But I would like to see a response to the substance, particularly the attack on the infrastructure of Gaza, which seems to me to be absolutely unjustifiable.”

Justice Richard Goldstone though agreed with the findings of his three co-investigators; professor Christine Chinkin (London School of Economics), Hina Jilani, a Human Right advocate from Pakistan and Colonel Desmond Travers (Irish Armed Force) – but, as Zionist Jew, he told Moyers that he supports the Israelis (foreign Jew settlers) to defend themselves against the rocket attacks from the Natives on whose land State of Israel is established. In this regard, the Jewish historian, John Kaminski, is more honest. He wrote: “When you read the history of Israel from objective sources, you discover that it is an outlaw state, created by the powers that be by stealing the land from its original inhabitants, and systematically exterminating them ever since.”

I believe that when the Israeli professor Yeshyahu Leibowictz defined holocaust as the new Jewish religion – he was trying to be modest – as it practice it has long passed the threshold of ‘religion’ since Israel’s 1967 invasion of its Arab neighbors during which it occupied the entire pre-1947 Palestine. One can insult the Bible or ridicule the Biblical prophets – but one must not be blasphemous about the “Six Million Died” doctrine.

If one refuses to believe in Jesus’s virgin birth or insult prophets Moses, Jesus or Muhammad (pbuh) or ridicule Christian Bible (NT) or Holy Qur’an – No western law enforcement authority would consider it a hate crime. However, if someone dare to question the Zionist narrative of the Jewish genocide at the hands of Nazis (though allegedly 150,000 German Jews too  served in the Nazi Army and Hitler’s administration) – he would surely loose his career, or made to pay a heavy fine or even end up in jail in some western countries. In other words, it has become more sacred than Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The French philosopher Roger Garaudy found it the hard way. A French court had fined him US$40,000 for questioning the Holocaust’s official story in his book ‘The Founding Myths of Israely Politics’. The current victim of this ‘holy cow’ is Iranian Prsident, Dr. Ahmadinejad, who doesn’t deny the Jewish genocide by the Nazis – but questions the ‘holiness’ of the “six million”, and this ‘holy cow’ doctrine applied on Palestinians who had nothing to do what happened to the Jews in 1940s Europe (watch a video at the end of this post).

Kevin Barrett PhD, an American author, talk-show host and lecturer, who has converted to Islam – posted his latest article, titled Holocaustism vs Islam, believe that since the German court has fined Bishop Richard Williamson to the tune of US$18,000 for questioning the ’six million Jews killed’ – makes clear that Holocaustism has replaced Christianity as well as Judaism.

“You can tell which story is sacred and which one isn’t by the reaction you get when you commit sacrilege. No where in the West is being brought up on charges of denying the crucification-resurrection. People can blithely doubt the crucification and the resurrection and the virgin birth and the trinity and other tenets of Christianity and still work in great universities of the West. In fact, if they don’t doubt these things, they might have a harder time getting hired. Admit at a faculty luncheon that you don’t doubt the resurrection or the virgin birth, and you will get some very strange looks.

But admit that you doubt any aspect of the sacred Holocaust narrative – six million Jewish victims, most killed in gas chambers, as part of pre-conceived effort to eliminate Jewry from the face of the earth – and you will never work in this town again. Thus we are treated to the spectacle of a Catholic bishop being tried by a new Inquisition for a heresy that has nothing to do with Catholism.

My wise old Kabbalah professor, Jacob Needleman, once pointed out that the Holocaust caused a great many Jews to loose their faith in God. How could a good God let this happen? Abandoning God, these Jews joined the atheist Zionists who were colonizing Palestine. They started worshipping the state of Israel and its power instead of God, the source of all power. So it’s easy to understand why Holocaustism, the sacred foundation of secular Zionism, became the majority religion of today’s ethnic Jews.

But why Holocaustism has replaced Christianity? I suppose it’s because Christianity has been in slow decline for several centuries. By 19th century, neither the thinking nor the ruling classes really believed in God any more – as A. N. Wilson wrote in the book “God’s Funeral: The Decline of Faith in Western Civilization”. The reaction against Christianity in post-Christian Europe reached the point that by the post-world War II period, a residual Christian guilty complex met Jewish-Holocaust power in the media - and the result was Holocaustism replacing Christianity as the core sacred narrative of the West.

Islam vs Holocaustism

Islam, the world’s fastest growing religion, is immune to Holocaustism for two reasons. First, Muslim understand and oppose the Holocaustist atrocities in Palestine. “By their fruits ye shall know them”, said Jesus (as) – and the fruits of Holocaustist Zionism – millions of people ethnic-cleaned, children shot for sport with impunity, white phosphorus dropped on the world’s most densely populated space, and on and on – are as visible evil to Muslims as they are ivisible evil to the Westerners.

Second, Islam is build around the core teachings of Tawhid: the Absolute, Eternal Oneness of God as the only appropriate object of worship. The worst possible sin, from an Islamic perspective, is worshipping something other than God. So Muslims are not easily drawn into worshipping alleged sons of God, crucifications, trinities, chosen people, or even Holocausts.

Since Muslims stubbornly persist in worshipping God rather than the Holocaust, the 9/11 false-flag attack was orchestrated in order to launch a Holocaustist crusade against Islam. Just as the sacred story of Holocaust was used to brainwash Jews into believing they had been victimized and thus had the right to become vengeful victimizer, the sacred official story of 9/11 was used to brainwash Americans and Westerners into believing that they too had been victimized, and that thus they too must become vengeful victimizers. In both cases, the victims of vengeance was Arabs and Muslims – though why Holocaustists would take vengeance against Germans by mass-murdering and ethnic-cleansing Arabs and Muslims has never been explained……

When the dust settle, inshAllah, I think more and more Westerners will come to realize that the Muslims were right all along – not only about history and politics, but more importantly, about God.

After reading a front page news in the Jewish ‘The Wall Street Journal’ (October 31, 2009) – I am convinced that the officials in the US State Department are true believers in the Scofield Bible. How else they would have bent backward to save 60 Yemeni Jews in a “secret mission” – rather than rescuing the lives of thousands of Yemeni Christians and even American citizens traped in the war-torn Yemen.

According to WSJ – these 60 Yemeni Jews (350 total Jews among country’s 23 million population), dressed in Turban and Burka, traveled to nation’s capital San’a’ – and from there, the US State Department put them on a plane – surprisingly, destined not to Israel – but the US. This is largest western-sponsored Jew-rescue mission since 1949-50 “Operation Magic Carpet”, when close to 49,000 Yemeni Jews were airlifted to Israel.

Washington’s double standard are obvious – considering the plight of common Yemeni citizens as the result of the USrael proxy wars in the region. Mahmoud Kabil, the UNICEF’s ‘Goodwill Ambassador’ for the Middle East and North Africa, was quoted by IRIN on October 20, 2009: “I saw children in al-Mazraq refugee camp (Northwest of Sanaa) on the brink of death due to acute malnutrition and dehydration. I have never seen such a sight since I became UNICEF regional Goodwill Ambassador in 2003…”

Yemen has more strategic importance to Israel than the US. That’s why Obama, not only sent General David Petraeus to Yemen to show his support for the beleaguered regime of president Ali Abdullah Saleh in July but last month wrote a personal letter to president Saleh that Yemen is “vital to the region and the US”.

Currently, Sanaa is carrying out the genocide of Yemen Shia majority (Zaidis) in the Saada province bordering USrael buddy Saudi Arabia. The Zaidi resistance against the pro-American government of President Saleh goes back to 2004 when the Shia leaders demaded equal rights for the Sa’dah and Amran provinces with overwhelming Shia majority. Presiden Saleh, in return, has accused the Zaidi leaders for planning to revive the old Zaidi Shia Imamate which was overthrown in a communist military coup (supported by both Egypt and Israel) in 1962. This Imamate existed between 837-1962. Zaidyyah is the closest Shia ‘School of Thought’ to the majority Sunni Islam.

According to UN report – since Saleh’s latest military action against the Zaidi tribes – 50,000 people have been made refugees – making 150,000 refugees since June 2004. Tehran has offered its services to resolve the conflict between the San’a and the Ziadi resistance groups.

Rannie Amiri in his 2008 article, titled Yemeni Daggers Unsheathed, wrote:

“Indeed, the struggle of al-Houthi’s forces in North Yemen is not unlike that of Hezbollah in Lebanon (Shia), Hamas in Gaza (Sunni) and Muqtada al-Sadr’s followers in Baghdad (Shia). All have demanded an end to the colussion between the ruling authority and the United State and Israel; endured or are at present enduring a humanitarian crisis; accused of being under Iranian influence, and feared by the leaders of the Sunni Arab states for using the ballot box to achieve political legitimacy.

The one distinguishing feature is what little attention the Sa’dah Zaidis have received. Of the many hardships they continue to face, neglet of their plight should not be made one of them.”

While innocent American Muslim citizens are being framed or killed on cook-up criminal allegations, such as the recent arrest of young Tariq Mehana and shoot-to-death of Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah (Dearborn) – Barack Obama, his secretary of state, Zionist Hillary Clinton, and State Department’s special representative to the Muslim communities, Farah Pandith – are traveling to the remote corners of the world to paint a “tolerant Muslim America” and recruit the so-called “moderate” (anti-political-Islam) Muslim leadership. Hillary Clinton during his recent trip – paid a visit to the city of Kazan on October 14, 2009. It was the first a senior US official paid a visit to the predominantly Muslim Tataristan. Hillary Clinton called Republic of Tartaristan the “Muslim model” that should be followed by the rest of Muslim countries (interestingly, only a few year ago – that ‘title’ was reserved for the Kemalist Turkey). 

Steven Pifer, former State Department official and currently a Fellow at the zionist think tank Brookings Institute, had nothing but good words for Hillary’s venture into Kazan: “Washington is not just negotiating with the government in Moscow, but is engaging in some outreach to the broader country….. Clinton is demonstrating that part of the approach to Russia is outreach to broader society.”

Professor Nicholas Gvosdev (US Naval College) believes the visit will benefit Obama administration’s broader outreach to the Muslim world.

People of Tartaristan are basically Volga Bulgars, who converted to Islam in the middle of 10th century as result of dawa work by Ahmad ibn Fadlan. It was part of Kazan Khanate for over 300 year until it was occupied by Russians in 16th century. Tartaristan has a population of three million – 53% are Muslim, while the rest belong to Russian Orthodox, which took its roots in the late 15th century.

According to Dr. Saadiev – since the communist-regime absolved their ancestral homeland of Qarm Tartars in 1934 – the 18 million Muslim Tartars, out of which three million live in the Republic of Tartaristan and the remaining 15 million have been made homeless. He saisd that the communist-regime carried out the ethnic-cleansing of Tartars by forced migration out of their homeland – causing the death of 50,000 – while 1.5 million were summarily executed. The communists (mostly Jews) blew up 1500 mosques and religious schools while tens of thousands of copies of Holy Qur’an and other Islamic literature were put on fire (Ad Dawa magazine).

Since the collapse of USSR, Islam has become more visible than under the Communist rule. Several dozen mosques and religious schools (Madrasas) have been established. In 2007, Trataristan’s president Mintimer Shaimiyev was awarded with King Faisal Award for “Service to Islam”.

After destroying the true divine messages of Judaism and Christianity – The western Lucifrins find Muslims putting the last fight against their evil agenda of the World Order under Jewish domination. As Canadian Jewish academic Henry Makow PhD once wrote: “Therefore, the War Against Islam”. Zionists and Evangelists are spending millions of dollars each year to teach Muslims how to “Europeanize” or “Westernize” or “Modernize” Islam – in such a way that it’s acceptable to the West.

Western mainstream media is very slick one that has mastered the technique of presenting evil as good and good as evil. However, at the end of the day – its anti-Islam pro-Israel thugs have to realize that Islam is not a man-made product whose patent has expired, like Judaism and Christianity – so anyone is free to turn-out a’ new and improved (RIV)’ version of it. Islam is the religion revealed by the Creator (Allah); as such it comes with solid safeguards against any future entrepreneurs wishing to rebrand and refranchise the original under their own corporate name to satisfy the ZOGs and to attract more sheep. Holy Qur’an has mentioned that the Islamic faith is not only “perfected” by Allah, but Allah also has promised to “preserve and protect” it.

Even though, the internet has exposed almost each of Zionist lies – one must give credit to Zionists for being consistant with their lying nature. They have been caught red-handed for putting words in their critics’ mouths – from Castro to Bishop Tutu; from Imam Khomeini to Chavez and from Ahmadinejad to Erdogan. The latest one is JTA’s (October 27, 2009) headline: “Iran will keep nukes as long as Israel does”. Disregarding IAEA’s several findings which confirmed that while Iran doesn’t have nuclear bombs (at least not yet), Israel has a stockpile of those – in fact what Ahmadinejad did say during his meeting with Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (as reported by JTA under the headline): “Iran will continue to progress in its nuclear program (doesn’t say for military usage) as long as Israel continues to have nuclear weapons. When an illegal regime possesses nuclear weapons, the other countries’ right for peaceful nuclear energy cannot be denied.”

Iranian government has just told IAEA watchdog that until the country receive the neclear fuel bought from France for its reactor in Tehran – it intends to keep its lightly enriched uranium inside Iran. Earlier, IAEA had negotiated a deal under which Tehran would ship 75% of its spent uranium stock to Russia and France for further reprocessing. Iranian nuclear negotiators had made a counter offer that Tehran may agree to IAEA’s proposal only if it gurantee foreign supply of nuclear fuel for the Iranian reactor, which is used for the production of medical isotopes for cancer treatment.

Since Islamic Revolution in 1979 – Tehran has developed very close relations with its nuclear neighbors (Russia, China, India and Pakistan) – with Russia and China being its major trading partners. All those four neighbors have their eyes set on Iran’s oil and gas resrves (second largest in the Middle East after Saudi Arabia). China is soon to become Iran’s No.1 trading partner (currently it stands US$29 billion annually). This is the major economic factor which would dull any US additional sanctions against Islamic Iran. Iran’s weak point, which the ZOGs intend to exploit – is country’s existing limited petroleum refining capacity. In order to counter western sanctions in this field, Chinese companies have already signed contracts worth US$8 billion to expand Iranian refineries.

Dilip Hiro in his October 29 article, titled Why Obama\’s Iran Policy Will Fail wrote:

“Obama has not drawn the right conclusion from his predeccesor’s failed Iran policy. A paradigm of sticks-and-carrots is simply not going to work in the case of Islamic Republic. Here, a lesson is readily available, if only the Obama White House is willing to consider Iran’s recent history. It’s unrealistic to expect that a regime which fought Saddam Hussein’s Iraq (then backed by the US) to standstill in a bloody eight-year war in the 1980s, unaided by any foreign power, and has for 30 years withstood the cosequences of the US-imposed economic sanctions will be alarmed by Washington’s fresh threat of Crippling Sanction (as demanded by its Tel Aviv master, Bibi).

The Chinese want to import Iran’s petroleum and natural gas through pipelines across Central Asia, thus circumventing sea routes vulnerable to US naval interdiction. As this is integral part of China’s energy security policy, little wonder that Chinese oil companies have committed an estimated US$120 billions – so far – to Iran’s energy industry.

As a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran is, in fact entitled to enrich uranium. The key point is the degree of enrichment: 5% enriched uranium for use as fuel in the electricity generating plant (called low enriched uranium); 20% enriched uranium for use as feedstock for producing medical isotopes), and 90%-plus for bomb-grade fuel……”