Zionist entity’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu doesn’t want Ankara to act as a mediator between Tel Aviv and Damascus due to AKP’s foreign policy tilt toward Hamas and Tehran: “I object to Turkey resuming its role as mediator. I don’t see how country can become ‘an honest broker’ between the two sides.” Netanyahu prefers France to replace Turkey as the mediator. However, no sensible Arab leader is going to believe Nicholas Sarkozy as “an honest mdeiator”, knowing his Jewishness (he is son of a Jewish mother and a Christian father) and his past involvement with Israeli Mossad.
Turkey conducted five rounds of mediation between Tel Aviv and Damascus during Ehud Olmert’s tenure as the ‘Zionazi Don’.
Now, Netanyahu has either take the advice of French FM, Miguel Angel Moratinos: “The Turks will fall in line if they served as mediators between Israel and Syria,” repoerted by daily Ha’aretz on October 18, 2009. However, my advice to Bibi would be to project Saudi Arabia as the replacement of Turkey – because the ‘royals’ are known the best when it comes to serving western interests in the Muslim world.
The Saudi royals have a very long history their collaboration with the enemies of Islam and Muslims. They were on British Foreign Office’s payroll for a long time. After they were helped by the British to occupy Najad, they used their Wahhabi facade to promote Shia-Sunni sectarianism in order to keep the Muslim Ummah divided. This proven trick they are still applying in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen.
Last month when Saudi King visited Damascus – Jewish-owned The Wall Street Journal (October 7, 2009) gleefully reported that the King was following western ZOGs to pursue Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad to distant himself from non-Arab Iran and assert his influence over Lebanon: “The US and EU officials who see Syria as a linchpin in curbing the influence of Iran and its proxies, such as militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas”. Aside from Israeli propaganda – the fact is that both Hamas (a Sunni resistance group) and Hezbollah (a Shia resistance group) are much less proxies of Shia Iran than the Christian US is the proxy of Jewish Israel. Tehran provides moral support to Hezbollah, while both moral and financial support to Hamas – which is far less than the moral and financial support Zionist regime receives from the US and EU.
Incidentally, Damascus cannot play Washington’s agenda in occupied Iraq. Shia’s make more than 60% of Iraqi population and most of its leaders lived in Iran during their exile. On the other hand, al-Assad belongs to a tiny Alawite Shia minority in a Sunni-majority Syria.
Saudi do have major influence over Taliban, as majority of Taliban are students from Saudi-funded Wahhabi madrasas in Pakistan’s northern province. However, over 500 million Iranian aid for Afghan infrastructure and Agha Khan Foundation’s social works have won the hearts of Karzai government officials and milions of Afghans – both Sunnis and Shias. It’s interesting to note that every time Karzai has visited Washington – he has made a stop-over in Tehran. So is the case with Pakistan’s presidents General Pervez Musharraf and Asif Zardari.
Now Saudis have thrown their support behind Yemen’s president Saleh, who is carrying out the genocide of Yemeni Shia population (50%). Washington, Tel Aviv and EU – are all supporting president Saleh fearing another Hizb’Allah appearing next-door to Israel.
Since Junallah terrorist attack in Iranian Balochistan province which Tehran blamed on the US-Israel-Saudi Arabia-Pakistan Axis – Tehran’s view on both Afghanistan and Iraq has hardened. Now Tehran demands that American and NATO occupation forces must withdraw immediately from Afghanistan and Iraq.
Rehmat's World 